How Does Hydrostatic Equilibrium Affect Star Pressure Calculation?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of hydrostatic equilibrium in stars, specifically focusing on deriving a relation for the pressure of a star as a function of radius, given a specific density profile that varies with distance from the center of the star.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive a pressure function based on a density profile that follows a power law, questioning how to satisfy both the power law assumption and boundary conditions. Other participants suggest using a specific density profile and discuss its implications for calculating core pressure in neutron stars.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different density profiles and their suitability for the problem. There is an ongoing examination of how these profiles relate to the calculations of pressure, particularly in the context of neutron stars. No consensus has been reached, but various approaches are being considered.

Contextual Notes

There are boundary conditions imposed on the density and mass equations that participants are trying to satisfy while adhering to the power law assumption. The discussion also touches on the implications of these calculations for theoretical models of stars.

dats13
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Assume a star is in hydrostatic equilibrium and that the density of the star is follows
\rho \propto \frac{1}{r^{a}}

where \r is the distance from the centre of the star and \r is a constant.

Derive an relation for the pressure of the star as a function of \r.

Homework Equations



Hydrostatic Equilibrium:
<br /> \frac{dP}{dr} = - \rho(r) \frac{G m(r)}{r^2} (1)<br />

Mass Equation:
<br /> \frac{\mathrm{d} M}{\mathrm{d} r}=\rho (r)4\pi r^{2} dr (2)<br />


The Attempt at a Solution


I am assuming that the following boundary conditions must be satisfied.

<br /> \rho(0) = \rho_c \; \; \; \rho(R) = 0<br />
<br /> m(0) = 0 \; \; \; m(R) = M_{tot}<br />

The problem that I run into is satisfying these equations with the assumption

\rho \propto \frac{1}{r^{a}}

If I assume
\rho(r) = \rho_c(1-(r/R)^{a})


then the boundary conditions are satisfied, but the power law assumption is not.

Once I get the suitable function for \rho, then I can solve Eq. (2) for the Mass as a function of r and then (1) to get a function for the pressure.

But I am unsure of how to satisfy both the power law and boundary conditions for \rho.

Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the best density profile (for a gas star and probably a neutron star) and the one worth solving for is ρ(r)=ρc(1−(r/R)a) with a=2. Using this I calculated ρc = 2.5M/V where M/V = average star density. So ρ(r)=2.5M(1−(r/R)2)/V. I think this should be used in the pressure integral. I'm interested in accurately calculating the core pressure for neutron stars and theoretical compact gas stars. I want to show that neutron star core pressure is significantly less than ρ(c)2. Anybody there?
 
Rewrite using different format: I think the best density profile (for a gas star and probably a neutron star) and the one worth solving for is ρ = ρc(1−(r/R)^a) where ρc = core density and a = 2. Using this I calculated ρc = 2.5M/V where M/V = average star density. So ρ = 2.5M[1−(r^2/R^2)]/V. I think this should be used in the pressure integral. I'm interested in accurately calculating the core pressure for neutron stars and theoretical compact gas stars. Probably neutron star core pressure at collapse is less than relativistic pressure of (ρc^2)/3. Anybody there?
 
The OP has graduated. Thread closed.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K