How Does Impulsive Force Affect Particle Velocity Over Time?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Samuelb88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the relationship between impulsive force and particle velocity over time, specifically addressing a problem involving a force function f(t) acting on a particle of mass m. The conclusion drawn is that the equation x'(h) = ∫_0^h f(t) dt is only valid under the condition that the mass m is equal to 1, indicating a potential typo in the textbook. The participants emphasize the importance of unit consistency in verifying equations, noting that the presence of "dt" in the integral affects the resulting units.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Second Law of Motion
  • Familiarity with integral calculus
  • Knowledge of particle dynamics
  • Ability to analyze units in physical equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review Newton's Second Law and its applications in particle motion
  • Study the principles of impulse and momentum
  • Learn about unit analysis in physics equations
  • Explore advanced topics in integral calculus related to physics
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators and anyone involved in teaching or learning about the dynamics of particles under force.

Samuelb88
Messages
160
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose that on the time interval [0,h] we have a force acting along the x-axis with magnitude 0 \leq f(t) at time t, and f(0) = f(h) = 0. For a particle of mass m starting at rest, so that its distance x(t) from 0 satisfies 0 = x(0) = x'(0), show that x'(h) = \int_0^h f(t) dt.

The Attempt at a Solution


This is one of those problems where I swear I am right and the book is wrong. :biggrin:

Let P denote the particle. Then on the interval [0,h], the force f(t) acts on P along the x-axis so henceforth I will write f(t) = (f(t),0) = f(t). The second law tells me that mx'' = f(t). Hence
\int_0^h f(t) dt = \int_0^h m x'' dt = \int_0^h mv' dt = mv(h) - mv(0) = mv(h)

since v(0) = x'(0) = 0. So this seems to contradict what I was suppose to show except in the special case that m=1. I haven't really used my assumption that f(0) = 0 = f(h), but I can't think of how that would tie into this problem other than tell me that there is no net force acting on P at both t=0 and t=h. Would someone mind giving me some pointers on this one? :smile:

- Sam
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct. It's likely this is a simple typo in the book, omitting the m from the solution, especially since they went to the trouble of saying "a particle of mass m".

EDIT added:
When in doubt it's often helpful to check units in an equation, which in this case proves the equation in the book must be wrong. Note that the "dt" inside the integral contributes a factor of seconds to the resulting units.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K