How Does Integrating Magnetic Field in a Solenoid Result in BL?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kasse
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ampere's law Law
Click For Summary
Integrating the magnetic field B along a path ds in a solenoid results in the equation BL, where L represents the length of the solenoid. Ampere's law typically involves an Amperian loop, where the length L and the number of turns N depend on the loop's size, making them arbitrary. To derive a more useful equation, the turns per length n is introduced, leading to B = μ₀ n I. For a real solenoid, the total turns N and total length L can be substituted back into the equation as B = μ₀ (N/L) I. This distinction clarifies the difference between the values used in Ampere's law and those for a specific solenoid.
kasse
Messages
383
Reaction score
1
Why is it that integrating B ds gives BL where L is the length of the solenoid?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The usual method of using Ampere's law does not directly give the length of the solenoid, because the usual assumption is that the solenoid is infinitely long.

The Amperian loop is usually a rectangle, with a side of length L inside and outside the solenoid, and there are N turns of the solenoid passing through the loop. Then Ampere's law gives:

<br /> B L = \mu_0 N I<br />

But the specific values of N and L were rather arbitrary in that they depended on how big the loop is; if the loop's side inside the solenoid were doubled, both N and L would double. To get something useful, they combine this in terms of n, the turns per length:

<br /> B = \mu_0 n I<br />

Now when you use this equation for a real solenoid, if they give you the total turns and total length of the solenoid, you can go back and plug these in:

<br /> B = \mu_0 \frac{N}{L} I<br />

but these values of N and L (total turns and total length) are technically not the N and L (turns going through Amperian loop and length of one of the sides of the Amperian loop) that you use in Ampere's law.

Did that answer what you were asking?
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K