Confusion on the magnitude of magnetic fields

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Ampere's law in the context of magnetic fields within a pipe that exhibits rotational motion. Participants express confusion regarding the behavior of the magnetic field components, particularly in relation to a solenoid-like system.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of Ampere's law, questioning its applicability in the interior of the pipe and the conditions under which the magnetic field components are zero. There is a focus on the relationship between the direction of current and the geometry of the chosen loops for applying the law.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and questioning each other's interpretations of Ampere's law. Some have suggested that the original poster may be misapplying the law, while others are seeking clarification on how to correctly apply it in this specific scenario.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing debate about the assumptions made regarding the symmetry of the system and how it affects the magnetic field components. Participants are also considering the implications of the pipe's motion on the magnetic field, which adds complexity to the application of Ampere's law.

Gourab_chill
Messages
55
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
I've put question below.
Relevant Equations
B=µNI; N=no of turns for unit length of solenoid
Capture.PNG

Here, the correct options are A,D.
Solution:
Capture1.PNG

I got A as answer as ∫ B.dl=µI. But, the answer to the question says that it is a solenoid and therefore Bx=0 for point P. Here I'm a bit confused. I know this system resembles a solenoid in some ways, then By must have some finite value, but ampere's law says there should be no magnetic field in the pipe or it's magnitude is zero. Where am I mistaking?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe you are applying Ampere's law wrongly in the interior of the pipe (probably because you are misconceiving the symmetries present in this system). From Ampere's law we can't deduce that the B-field will be zero inside, not for this system. If the pipe was doing only translational motion then we could deduce that the B-field would be zero inside but because it does rotational motion too around the y-axis, it generates a component ##B_y## in the interior that it isn't zero.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
Delta2 said:
I believe you are applying Ampere's law wrongly in the interior of the pipe (probably because you are misconceiving the symmetries present in this system). From Ampere's law we can't deduce that the B-field will be zero inside, not for this system. If the pipe was doing only translational motion then we could deduce that the B-field would be zero inside but because it does rotational motion too, it generates a component ##B_y## in the interior that it isn't zero.
So, where is exactly ampere's law applicable? If the current is moving around the pipe (due to rotational motion as here), we cannot apply it? Does the current have to be perpendicular to the imaginary circle we consider in ampere's law?
 
Ampere's law is applicable everywhere, I just meant that you apply the law in the wrong way for this system.
Please write a post and explain with as much detail as possible how do you apply Ampere's law for this system so that you infer that ##B_y=B_x=B_z=0## for the interior of the pipe. ##B_x## and ##B_z## are indeed zero but not ##B_y##.
 
Delta2 said:
Ampere's law is applicable everywhere, I just meant that you apply the law in the wrong way for this system.
Please write a post and explain with as much detail as possible how do you apply Ampere's law for this system so that you infer that ##B_y=B_x=B_z=0## for the interior of the pipe. ##B_x## and ##B_z## are indeed zero but not ##B_y##.
All I knew till now is that by applying ampere's law the net magnetic field at a point is zero if it does not encloses any current.
For solenoids as I looked up, the derivation also uses ampere's law, however here the loop encloses current due to it's position which I've tried to show in the first figure. What if we take the loop as in the second figure? The magnetic field should be zero in the second case or is the loop position wrong?
Untitled.png
 
lets focus on the second case. Assume that the B-field has a ##B_y## component (y the axis of the pipe). Do we get any info for this ##B_y## component by applying Ampere's law for the loop shown in the second case? NO we don't because ##B_y## is always perpendicular to the ##dl## of the loop (since the loop lies in the x-z plane) so it is ##\vec{B_y}\cdot \vec{dl}=0## because the dot product is always zero as long as the vectors are perpendicular to each other. ##B_y## might be zero or might be any other value but because its dot product will be zero (for this specific loop we choose to apply the law), amperes law hold. That is Ampere's law hold for any choice of ##B_y## for this specific loop.

If we choose the loop of the first case, then we can extract useful info about ##B_y## (because it is not perpendicular everywhere , it is in the same direction as ##dl## in the segments of the loop that are along the y-axis) by applying ampere's law for this loop.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Gourab_chill
Delta2 said:
lets focus on the second case. Assume that the B-field has a ##B_y## component (y the axis of the pipe). Do we get any info for this ##B_y## component by applying Ampere's law for the loop shown in the second case? NO we don't because ##B_y## is always perpendicular to the ##dl## of the loop (since the loop lies in the x-z plane) so it is ##\vec{B_y}\cdot \vec{dl}=0## because the dot product is always zero as long as the vectors are perpendicular to each other. ##B_y## might be zero or might be any other value but because its dot product will be zero (for this specific loop we choose to apply the law), amperes law hold. That is Ampere's law hold for any choice of ##B_y## for this specific loop.

If we choose the loop of the first case, then we can extract useful info about ##B_y## (because it is not perpendicular everywhere , it is in the same direction as ##dl## in the segments of the loop that are along the y-axis) by applying ampere's law for this loop.
Thanks :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
49
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
5K