How Does Integration by Parts Apply in Calculating Average Energy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Moneer81
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 3K views
Moneer81
Messages
158
Reaction score
2
Hi,

while solving for the average energy given by the following formula:

[tex]\overline {E} = \frac {\int_{0}^{\infty} E e^\frac{-E}{kT}dE}{\int_{0}^{\infty} e^\frac{-E}{kT}dE}[/tex]

where E bar is average energy, k is the Boltzmann's constant, and T is temperature

I had to use integration by parts for the numerator.

Integration by parts formula is [tex]\int u dv = uv - \int v du[/tex]

So I made the following choices (and so did my textbook):

[tex]u = E[/tex]

then [tex]du = dE[/tex]

[tex]dv = e^\frac{-E}{kT}[/tex]

and so [tex]v = -kTe^\frac{-E}{kT}[/tex]

Then I proceeded by applying the integration by parts formula, and the integral of the numerator would be:

[tex]\int_{0}^{\infty} E e^\frac{-E}{kT}dE = -EkTe^\frac{-E}{kT} + kT \int_{0}^{\infty} e^\frac{-E}{kT}dE[/tex]

but to my surprise, the book proceeded in the following manner:

[tex]\int_{0}^{\infty} E e^\frac{-E}{kT}dE = kT \left[e^\frac{-E}{kT} \right]<br /> _{0}^{\infty} + kT \int_{0}^{\infty} e^\frac{-E}{kT}dE[/tex]

That first term to the right of the equal sign threw me off...where did it come from?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
First

[tex]dv=e^{-\frac{E}{kT}} \ dE[/tex]

then you're right. It has to be some error in the book. Perhaps they meant

[tex]kT \left[e^{-\frac{E}{kT}}\right]_{+\infty}^{0}[/tex]

,that is converting the minus before the whole term into an interchange of integration limits.

Daniel.