How Does Mass Affect the Resonant Frequency of a Quartz-Crystal Monitor?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hadoque
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Approximation
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around modeling the resonant frequency of a quartz-crystal thickness monitor using a mass-spring system. Participants are exploring how mass affects the resonant frequency and the implications of adding additional mass.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the resonant frequency and the frequency shift due to added mass, questioning the validity of their approach and the elimination of terms in their equations. Some participants suggest differentiating the frequency with respect to mass as a potential method.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing suggestions and exploring different mathematical approaches. There is no explicit consensus on the best method yet, but some guidance has been offered regarding differentiation.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information they can use or the methods they can apply.

hadoque
Messages
39
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Model the vibrating quartz-crystal thickness monitor as a mass(m)-spring combination, where k is the spring constant.
a) What is the resonant frequency?
b) Show that as additional mass [tex]\delta m[/tex] deposits the the difference in resonant frequency or frequency shift is given by [tex]\Delta f \approx f_0 \delta m /2m[/tex] for [tex]\delta m / m \ll 1[/tex]


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


a) F=-kx
[tex]f = \frac{1}{2 \pi} \sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}[/tex]

b) [tex]\Delta f = \frac{1}{2 \pi} \sqrt{\frac{k}{\delta m +m}} - f_0[/tex]

Is this equation the right approach? Seems difficult to eliminate one whole term on the right side, and the k, how to get rid of that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi hadoque! :smile:

can't you just differentiate 1/√m ?
 
Wow, why didn't I think about that? I've doing to little math lately:)
 
relax :wink:

do what i do …

swim around and stare at things! :biggrin:

(you are a haddock, aren't you?)​
 
I sure am, and that was a good advice!
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
904
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K