How Does Mass Distribution Affect Rotational Dynamics of a Rod?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the rotational dynamics of a rod with point masses attached to its ends, focusing on how mass distribution affects its motion. The problem involves calculating the moment of inertia, angular momentum, and angular acceleration of the system as it rotates in a vertical plane about a pivot.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of point masses on the center of mass and moment of inertia of the rod. Questions arise regarding the interpretation of angles and the effects of mass distribution on torque and angular acceleration.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing insights on calculating moment of inertia and torque. Some guidance has been provided regarding the addition of moments of inertia for point masses, and there is ongoing exploration of the relationship between angles and forces in the context of torque.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of a multi-mass system and its rotational dynamics, with some uncertainty about the definitions and implications of angles in the problem setup. There is a focus on understanding the gravitational forces acting on the masses and their contributions to torque.

Panphobia
Messages
435
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


A rod of mass M and length l rotates in a vertical plane about its centre which is on a frictionless, horizontal pivot. On the ends of the rod are point-like masses m1 and m2, where m1 != m2.

a)moment of inerta about the center of the rod
b)Determine the angular momentum when the angular velocity is ω
c) Determine the angular acceleration when the rod makes an angle of θ with respect to the horizontal z-axis. For m1 > m2 what is the direction of the torque?
d) At what angle θ is the angular velocity ω the greatest?

The Attempt at a Solution


So I would know how to do this question without the point masses m1 and m2, what they do is change the centre of mass of the rod, so does this question have something to do with the change in the centre of mass? Also what does it mean when the rod makes an angle of θ with respect to the horizontal, does this mean it is slanted?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm reading this problem as implying that the rod is initially placed horizontal.
Ignoring the problem for a moment, just picture this situation - what will happen when the rod is let go?
 
What do you mean? Its already in motion.
 
Just you need to find the moment of inertia first.The moment of inertia of a rod around its centre is ML^2/12.
Now find the moment of inertia when the two masses are attached.
 
What is the difference? I know there is one, but in class we have only gone so far as to calculate moments of inertia, not any of this. Would I add the moments of inertia of the points to the moment of inertia of the rod?
 
Last edited:
Yes as they are point masses you can add them!
 
so (1/12)ML^2 + (1/2)m1L^2 + (1/2)m2L^2 = I ?
But since the moment of inertia for a point mass is mR^2 and R = L/2 would it actually be (1/4)mL^2?
 
Last edited:
Panphobia said:
so (1/12)ML^2 + (1/2)m1L^2 + (1/2)m2L^2 = I ?
But since the moment of inertia for a point mass is mR^2 and R = L/2 would it actually be (1/4)mL^2?

moment of inertia is given by MR2 where M==mass of the object;R==distance of the object from the axis around which we want moment of inertia.
 
ahhh so it is (1/4)m(1+2)L^2, thanks! I can figure out a) and b) with that...now for the others. What does c) mean by angle θ with respect to the horizontal? Is it slanted?
 
  • #10
Panphobia said:
ahhh so it is (1/4)m(1+2)L^2, thanks! I can figure out a) and b) with that...now for the others. What does c) mean by angle θ with respect to the horizontal? Is it slanted?

wait what is that (1/4)m(1+2)L^2 ?
why you have done m(1+2)
 
  • #11
Because 1/4m1L^2 + 1/4m2L^2 = (1/4)m(1+2)L^2
 
  • #12
Panphobia said:
Because 1/4m1L^2 + 1/4m2L^2 = (1/4)m(1+2)L^2
It should like this-
1/4m1L2+1/4m2L2

those are only different masses indicated by m1 and m2

I=ML2/12 + 1/4m1L2 + 1/4m2L2


I=ML2/12+1/4L2(m1+m2)
 
  • #13
So about my question in post #9?
 
  • #14
when it is at an angle (theta ) then it is slanting to the z axis.

see the attachment
 

Attachments

  • moment.png
    moment.png
    2.6 KB · Views: 588
  • #15
what significance does m1 > m2 have?
 
  • #16
it is necessary for rotating the rod, for giving it angular acceleration.
 
  • #17
This has something to do with T = I\alpha correct?
 
  • #18
right:)
 
  • #19
Hmm this may be a dumb question but it says it is making an angle with the horizontal axis, but I\alpha does not incorporate an angle, but T = r x F does, but then I am still stumped.
 
  • #20
T = r x F
yes it is a cross product and needs the angle

τ=r*F*sinθ

τ is the magnitude of the torque,
r is the displacement vector (a vector from the point from which torque is measured to the point where force is applied),
F is the force vector,
θ is the angle between the force vector and the lever arm vector.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #21
But that is difficult to say because there are two mass points. I was thinking r = L/2, then F = ma, and a = \alphar so T = m*r^2*\alpha*sinθ, but I can't help thinking I am missing something because there is another mass...
 
  • #22
Panphobia said:
But that is difficult to say because there are two mass points. I was thinking r = L/2, then F = ma, and a = \alphar so T = m*r^2*\alpha*sinθ, but I can't help thinking I am missing something because there is another mass...

you should first calculate the net torque at the center of the rod by both rods.Thn use T=I*(alpha)
 
  • #23
soooo T1 = m1*r*a*sinθ and T2 = m2*r*a*sinθ, then Tnet = T1 + T2
 
  • #24
Panphobia said:
soooo T1 = m1*r*a*sinθ and T2 = m2*r*a*sinθ, then Tnet = T1 + T2

how it is sinθ?
 
  • #25
What is the force vector in this question? I don't know that.
 
  • #26
the force due to point masses is the force vector here.It acts vertically downwards.
 
  • #27
wait so that means that θ between the force vector and displacement vector is (90 - (horizontal angle))?
 
  • #28
wait here force vector is the component of mg that is perpendicular to the rod
 
  • #29
oh right right, so then θ is the actual horizontal angle. I am still kind of iffy on this concept, it is in 3-d, so the rod has been tilted to the horizontal axis, and is not spinning towards this horizontal axis, so I am not completely sure how you can use the angle with respect to the horizontal to get the perpendicular component of mg.
 
  • #30
Panphobia said:
oh right right, so then θ is the actual horizontal angle. I am still kind of iffy on this concept, it is in 3-d, so the rod has been tilted to the horizontal axis, and is not spinning towards this horizontal axis, so I am not completely sure how you can use the angle with respect to the horizontal to get the perpendicular component of mg.
No. it's all in 2D, a vertical plane.
It doesn't matter whether the rod is rotating or not at this point. We just want to calculate the acceleration due to gravity when it's at angle theta to the horizontal. What torques do the gravitational forces on the different masses exert about the axis? How do they combine to a net torque?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K