How Does Momentum Conserve When a Biker Hits the Pavement?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the conservation of momentum in the context of a biker colliding with the pavement. Participants explore the principles of momentum conservation, the role of the Earth in the system, and the fate of kinetic energy during the collision. The conversation includes theoretical considerations rather than practical applications or homework-related queries.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a basic momentum conservation equation using two balls, questioning how this applies when a biker hits the pavement.
  • Another participant suggests that the system includes both the biker and the Earth, and questions how to quantify momentum conservation in this scenario.
  • A participant asks whether it is appropriate to consider the Earth as stationary given its movements, and inquires about the fate of the biker's kinetic energy upon impact.
  • Concerns are raised about the differences in mass between the Earth and the biker's helmet, suggesting that this affects the velocities post-collision.
  • One participant notes that while the Earth can be treated as stationary for simplicity, the velocities of both the biker and the Earth must be considered after the collision, and mentions that the rotational momentum can be ignored.
  • It is stated that the kinetic energy of the biker is dissipated as heat, sound, and deformation upon hitting the pavement.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on how to model the system and the implications of the Earth's mass and motion. There is no consensus on the best approach to quantify momentum conservation in this context, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the treatment of the Earth and the specifics of energy dissipation.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of the scenario, including the assumptions about the Earth's motion and the simplifications made for calculations. The discussion highlights the need for careful consideration of mass differences and energy transformations.

MattsVai
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
I have a fundamental question regarding conservation of momentum (not homework).

So if we have a system of 2 balls, identical in size and weight, one of which is initially stationary until hit by the other ball. We have the following:

m1v1 + 0 = 0 + m2v2

or v2 = v1

and therefore there is conservation of momentum. Now what happens when say a biker hits the pavement with his helmet... how does momentum conserve? Is this a system of Earth vs bikers head? How can I quantify the conservation of momentum? having a hard time understanding...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MattsVai said:
So if we have a system of 2 balls, identical in size and weight, one of which is initially stationary until hit by the other ball. We have the following:

m1v1 + 0 = 0 + m2v2

or v2 = v1
Note that this is only true in a head on collision i.e. one dimensional case, in general both balls will have a non zero velocity after the collision.
MattsVai said:
Now what happens when say a biker hits the pavement with his helmet... how does momentum conserve? Is this a system of Earth vs bikers head? How can I quantify the conservation of momentum? having a hard time understanding...
The system would be the biker (not just his head) and the earth. What do you mean your having hard time quantifying conservation of momentum?
 
Hi Hootenanny, thanks for the reply :)

So basically how do I demonstrate conservation of momentum for a system in which there is collision between a biker and pavement (earth)? Is it safe to consider the Earth as stationary given that it has rotational and translational movements? What happens to the kinetic energy of the biker once he hits the pavement... where does that energy go?

Cheers
 
not really the same case is here, because mass of Earth and of helmet is not same therefore velocity would differ.
 
MattsVai said:
Hi Hootenanny, thanks for the reply :)
No problem :smile:
MattsVai said:
So basically how do I demonstrate conservation of momentum for a system in which there is collision between a biker and pavement (earth)? Is it safe to consider the Earth as stationary given that it has rotational and translational movements?
You can consider that Earth stationary before the collision and just consider the velocity of the biker (which for the sake of simplicity we can model as a particle). After the collision however, you must consider the velocity of both the Earth and the biker. You can ignore the rotational momentum of both the biker and the Earth as this is not going to significantly affect the result. To be honest this calculation is going to produce a very small change in velocity for the earth, so I don't know how accurate this is going to be.
MattsVai said:
What happens to the kinetic energy of the biker once he hits the pavement... where does that energy go?
The kinetic energy is dissapated as heat, sound, deformation of helmet etc.
 
Makes sense :)

Thanks for the input Hootenanny.

All the best!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K