How Does Projectile Motion Work When a Ball is Thrown from a Cliff?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolves5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Projectiles
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a projectile motion problem involving a ball thrown from a 10 m high cliff with an initial velocity and angle. Participants are exploring the time of flight, horizontal distance traveled, and maximum height above the base of the cliff.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants attempt to calculate the time it takes for the ball to land, questioning the correct use of kinematic equations. There are discussions about the vertical velocity and the effect of gravity on the motion. Some participants express uncertainty about the values used in their calculations and the equations applied for different parts of the problem.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of various approaches to solving the problem, with participants providing guidance on using the correct equations and questioning assumptions about the initial conditions. Multiple interpretations of the time calculation and its implications for subsequent parts of the problem are being discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information available and the methods they can use. There is a focus on ensuring the correct application of physics principles in the context of projectile motion.

wolves5
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
A ball is thrown from the brink of a cliff 10 m high with an initial velocity of v0 = 4 m/s at an angle q0 = 31° above the horizontal.

a) How long does it take to land?
I did 4sin(31)-.5(-9.8)t^2, but that is not the right answer.

b) How far from the base of the cliff does it land?
I might be able to solve this one if I knew the time from part a. Can I just use d=vit + 0.5at^2?
c) What is its maximum height above the base of the cliff?
I don't know what to do for this one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For a) the ball has to travel 10 meters in the opposite direction of the initial velocity. If we define up as positive, then we get

-10 = 4sin(31)t - 0.5gt2

using the quadratic formula to solve for t will give you the time.

Try b) once you have the time for a).

For c) there are several ways to approach this. The velocity at the top of the trajectory has a vertical velocity of 0. Using this fact, you should be able to solve for the height.
 
I got a and b. For c, I used the equation: y=(vosin(theta))t -0.5gt^2. I did (4sin(31)(1.654) - 0.5(-9.81)(1.654^2). But its not the right answer. I don't know which equation to use know.
 
wolves5 said:
I got a and b. For c, I used the equation: y=(vosin(theta))t -0.5gt^2. I did (4sin(31)(1.654) - 0.5(-9.81)(1.654^2). But its not the right answer. I don't know which equation to use know.

That would be right if you used the right value for time. So how did you get 1.654 s for the time?
 
I used the time from part a. Isn't that right?
 
The time for part a is the time it takes to reach the ground. You need the time it takes for the ball to reach zero vertical velocity.
 
Would that be 2.5 seconds? I did Distance / Velocity. (10/4=2.5 sec). When I plugged that in, I didnt get the right answer.
 
Well, you have an initial vertical velocity of 4sin(31). You have an acceleration of -9.81m/s2. You can simply use a = (v2-v1)/t to solve for time.
 
Ok I did that and got 0.4082 seconds as my time. Then I did 4sin(31)(0.4082) - 0.5(-9.81)(0.4082^2). I got 0.02365m, but that's not right.
 
  • #10
How did you get 0.4082 seconds?
 
  • #11
I used the equation you gave me. a = (v2-v1)/t

So -9.8=(0-4)/t. I got t=0.4082 seconds
 
  • #12
Notice that throughout the discussion, I always use vertical velocity. Gravity only acts in the vertical direction. You need to use 4sin(31) instead of 4.
 
  • #13
Ok. So I did that and I got 0.210 seconds. Then I plugged it into the equation: 4sin(31)(0.210)-0.5(-9.81)(0.210^2). I got 0.649m, but that's not right.
 
  • #14
The equation for distance of a uniformly accelerated object is

d = v0t + 0.5at2

we normally write the second term as -0.5gt2 because we take gravity as negative. You essentially did that twice for your equation. Switch the sign of the second term and it should give you the proper answer. (Don't forget to add the distance to the bottom of the cliff.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
3K