How Does Reducing Wavelength Affect Photoelectron Kinetic Energy and Current?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jiayingsim123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photoelectric
AI Thread Summary
Reducing the wavelength of radiation increases the maximum kinetic energy of photoelectrons due to higher photon energy, which is independent of intensity. However, the maximum photoelectric current decreases because fewer photons are emitted per unit time when the wavelength is reduced, despite constant intensity. The relationship between intensity, frequency, and the number of emitted electrons is crucial; as frequency decreases with reduced wavelength, the number of emitted electrons also diminishes. Thus, while the kinetic energy of the electrons increases, the overall current is negatively impacted. Understanding these dynamics is essential for grasping the photoelectric effect.
jiayingsim123
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Radiation of wavelength 240nm gives rise to a maximum photoelectric current, I. The intensity of the incident radiation is maintained constant and the wavelength is now reduced.
State and explain the effect of this change on
(i) The maximum kinetic energy of the photoelectrons

(ii) The maximum photoelectric current I.




The Attempt at a Solution



I understand that for (i) the maximum KE will increase as the wavelength is reduced causing the photon energy to be larger and the maximum KE is independent of the intensity. However, I don't get (ii). My initial answer is that the maximum photoelectric current, I remains constant as the intensity if unchanged. However, the answer says that there are fewer photons per unit time, so the maximum current is smaller. Does frequency also affect the number of electrons emitted per unit time (since frequency is the number of cycles per unit time) and hence affect the magnitude of the photoelectric current?

I hope you can clear up my confusion! Thanks in advance! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you think the intensity of light means? :)

ehild
 
ehild said:
What do you think the intensity of light means? :)

ehild

Hi there!
Intensity just means the number of photons contained in the light beam. So the higher the intensity, the more photons are contained. I know clearly that if frequency is kept constant, an increase in intensity will increase the photoelectric current because current is the rate of flow of charge and an increase in intensity will increase the number of electrons emitted from the surface. However, in this case, the wavelength of the light beam is reduced, which means that the frequency is reduced as well. How does this affect the intensity and how does this then, affect the maximum photoelectric current?

I hope you can shed some light on this. Thanks!
 
jiayingsim123 said:
Hi there!
Intensity just means the number of photons contained in the light beam.

The intensity of light is the energy transferred in unit time through unit area.

ehild
 
You forgot that intensity of light is also associated with the frequency by the following relation:

I=nhf/A (n=no. of photons emitted per unit time, h=Planck's constant, f=frequency of light, A=area perpendicular to light's direction of propagation)

In this question, it is mentioned that the wavelength is reduced without the intensity changing. In order to effect this, you have to decrease the rate of emission of photons, by virtue of the formula written about.

A closer examination would require you to analyse the effects the increased maximum kinetic energy has on the photoelectric current (I=nAve). However, if you do the mathematics, you would get the same conclusion.

I hope this helps.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
794
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top