Wavelength-stopping potential dependence

  • Thread starter Thread starter Krushnaraj Pandya
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the photoelectric effect involving a point source emitting light at wavelengths of 5000 A and 2500 A. It establishes that while the number of electrons ejected remains constant when the wavelength is halved, the energy of the emitted photons increases, leading to a more than doubled stopping potential. The relevant equation, hf = work function + eV, indicates that the stopping potential is influenced by the work function, which is not zero. This clarifies the discrepancy in expected results regarding saturation current and stopping potential.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the photoelectric effect
  • Familiarity with photon energy calculations (E = hf)
  • Knowledge of stopping potential in photoelectric cells
  • Basic principles of electron emission and work function
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between photon energy and wavelength in detail
  • Learn about the work function of various metals used in photoelectric cells
  • Explore the implications of varying light intensity on saturation current
  • Investigate advanced concepts in quantum mechanics related to electron behavior
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on quantum mechanics and the photoelectric effect, as well as researchers exploring applications of photoelectric cells.

Krushnaraj Pandya
Gold Member
Messages
697
Reaction score
73

Homework Statement


Consider a point source emitting light of wavelength 5000 A. Light from this source is falling on a metallic cathode of photoelectric cell. It is also given that energy of a photon of wavelength 10,000 A is 1.23 eV. If the source of 5000 A is replaced by 2500 A wavelength but emitting same no. of photons in unit time, what will happen to the saturation current and stopping potential respectively?

Homework Equations


eV=KE(max)
no. of electrons ejected=no. of photons colliding (energy above work function)

The Attempt at a Solution


since no. of electrons ejected does not change with change in energy of photon, saturation photocurrent remains same.
halving the wavelength doubles the energy of a photon and therefore the electron, since V and energy of electron=0.5mv^2 are directly proportional. Stopping potential should be doubled, but the answer is given as it is more than doubled. Where am I wrong? I suspect doubling wavelength won't double the KE since work function is not zero- but then how do I arrive at the correct relation?
I'd appreciate some help, thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Where did you get your "relevant equation"? Isn't it missing something?
 
mjc123 said:
Where did you get your "relevant equation"? Isn't it missing something?
hf=work function+eV
 
So if you double hf without changing WF, how will eV change?
 
mjc123 said:
So if you double hf without changing WF, how will eV change?
Right, it will more than double
 
Thank you very much for your help :D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K