Wavelength-stopping potential dependence

  • Thread starter Thread starter Krushnaraj Pandya
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
Krushnaraj Pandya
Gold Member
Messages
697
Reaction score
73

Homework Statement


Consider a point source emitting light of wavelength 5000 A. Light from this source is falling on a metallic cathode of photoelectric cell. It is also given that energy of a photon of wavelength 10,000 A is 1.23 eV. If the source of 5000 A is replaced by 2500 A wavelength but emitting same no. of photons in unit time, what will happen to the saturation current and stopping potential respectively?

Homework Equations


eV=KE(max)
no. of electrons ejected=no. of photons colliding (energy above work function)

The Attempt at a Solution


since no. of electrons ejected does not change with change in energy of photon, saturation photocurrent remains same.
halving the wavelength doubles the energy of a photon and therefore the electron, since V and energy of electron=0.5mv^2 are directly proportional. Stopping potential should be doubled, but the answer is given as it is more than doubled. Where am I wrong? I suspect doubling wavelength won't double the KE since work function is not zero- but then how do I arrive at the correct relation?
I'd appreciate some help, thank you
 
on Phys.org
mjc123 said:
Where did you get your "relevant equation"? Isn't it missing something?
hf=work function+eV
 
mjc123 said:
So if you double hf without changing WF, how will eV change?
Right, it will more than double
 
Thank you very much for your help :D