How Does Refraction Affect Image Location in a Thin Lens Observation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the image location of a fish viewed through a thin converging lens with a focal length of 30 feet, positioned 2 feet above the water surface. The lens formula, 1/f = 1/s0 + 1/si, is essential for solving this problem. The fish, located 4 feet underwater, creates a virtual image that appears deeper than its actual position due to refraction at the water-air interface. Participants suggest sketching ray diagrams to visualize the light paths and accurately compute the image location.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thin lens equations and focal lengths
  • Knowledge of refraction principles, particularly Snell's Law
  • Ability to sketch ray diagrams for optical systems
  • Familiarity with the concept of virtual images in optics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Snell's Law in determining light refraction at interfaces
  • Learn how to derive and apply the lens maker's equation for different media
  • Explore ray tracing techniques for complex optical systems
  • Investigate the effects of different refractive indices on image formation
USEFUL FOR

Students studying optics, physics educators, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of image formation through lenses and the effects of refraction in different media.

guilesar
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A small fish, four feet below the surface of Lake Lansing is viewed through a simple thin converging lens with focal length 30 feet. If the lens is 2 feet above the water surface, where is the image of the fish seen by the observer? Assume the fish lies on the optical axis of the lens and that nair=1, nwater=1.33.


Homework Equations


\frac{1}{f} = \frac{1}{s_{0}} + \frac{1}{s_{i}}

and

\frac{1}{f} = \left(n-1\right)\left[\frac{1}{2R}\right]

where R2=-R1

The Attempt at a Solution


This problem is counter intuitive and I'm not sure how to solve it. The focal length of the lens is 30 feet... so the fish is before the focal length. Once the rays refract from the sunlight into the water, the light rays refract towards the normal, which in my mind would cause the light rays to converge further away... So I'm not sure how the water and converging lens would allow someone to see something closer than the focal length when in a isotropic medium an object before the lens would create a virtual image...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know how to apply the lens formula to this situation.
If I were doing the problem, I would go back to basics and sketch some rays. If the middle of the fish is on the optic axis then the nose of the fish will be a bit off the axis and you can draw a ray straight up out of the water to the lens and it will bend to the focal point above the lens. Ignoring the water/air surface for a sec, a second ray from the nose through the center of the lens would not bend and the intersection of the two rays would give the position of the image - looks like deeper than the actual location of the fish. But that ray hits the air surface at an angle greater than zero, so it will bend. One could calculate the bending and then try to deal with the change in the bending at the lens due to it not going through the center any more, or perhaps take a different ray that does go through the center but at a different angle due to the bending at the water/air surface. Either way, if you can compute the trajectory of two rays from the fish through the lens, you can then find the intersection of those rays and you'll have the location of the image.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K