How Does Rotating a Polarizing Filter Affect Sky Photography?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MrJimH
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sky
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the polarization of the sky and its implications for photography, particularly how rotating a polarizing filter affects the appearance of the sky in photographs. Participants explore the mechanisms behind sky polarization, the effects of using polarizing filters in photography, and the nature of light scattering.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the sky is polarized due to light scattering off particles in the atmosphere.
  • Others express skepticism about the polarization of sky light, questioning how it could occur given the isotropic nature of the atmosphere.
  • Several participants mention the practical effects of using polarized sunglasses or filters, noting changes in color and intensity when viewed at specific angles.
  • One participant describes the mechanism of Mie scattering as responsible for the polarization of the sky.
  • There is a discussion about the differences between linear and circular polarizers, with some suggesting that camera filters may combine both types.
  • Participants describe personal experiences with observing the effects of polarization in the sky and how it can be demonstrated with polarizing filters.
  • Some participants note that rotating a polarizing filter can lead to significant changes in the intensity of light captured in photographs, particularly when aimed at the sky.
  • There are conflicting views on whether rotating a polarizing filter will always produce observable changes in light intensity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the nature of sky polarization or the effects of polarizing filters. Multiple competing views remain, particularly regarding the mechanisms of polarization and the effectiveness of filters in photography.

Contextual Notes

Some claims about the nature of polarization and the effects of filters depend on specific conditions, such as the angle of observation and the type of light source. There are unresolved questions about the behavior of circularly polarized light and its interaction with camera optics.

MrJimH
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Why is the sky polarized?
 
Science news on Phys.org
It is? I never noticed any change when playing with polarized glasses and glare.
 
Both the polarization and the colors of the sky are created by light scattering off of random particles
 
Are you sure light from the sky is polarized? I'm not sure how this would happen given the isotropic and random nature of the atmosphere.
 
Phyisab**** said:
Are you sure light from the sky is polarized? I'm not sure how this would happen given the isotropic and random nature of the atmosphere.

yes try it out with some polarized sun glasses on a clear summer day its quite neat. the full explanation of how is described quite well here http://www.polarization.com/sky/sky.html
 
Interesting, you learn something every day. Someday I will get around to reading the chapter in my QM book on scattering, which we skipped over.
 
VanOosten said:
yes try it out with some polarized sun glasses on a clear summer day its quite neat.
Or any clear day, year round. Just look in a direction 90 degrees away from the sun to get the maximum effect.
 
Well, if the sky weren't polarized, then a polarizing filter on your SLR would not be much use in darking the sky.
800px-CircularPolarizer.jpg
 
  • #10
DaveC426913 said:
Well, if the sky weren't polarized, then a polarizing filter on your SLR would not be much use in darking the sky.
800px-CircularPolarizer.jpg

This is not an indication of polarization. You will get that effect with circularly polarized light. Read Redbelly's reply.
 
  • #11
VanOosten said:
yes try it out with some polarized sun glasses on a clear summer day its quite neat. the full explanation of how is described quite well here http://www.polarization.com/sky/sky.html



Thanks
 
  • #12
I've had grasses as long as I can remember. I have always loved to look at the sky with my prescritpion sun glasses and turn my head to watch the colors and intensity change. No matter what angle I look through there is always a view of the sky. It has light polarized in many directions, from what I can tell all. Try looking at a monitor with polarized glasses. Many are polarized in a single direction. You will find an angle where the screen is completely black. That happens when the light is polarized normal to your lenses. I love to stare at the angles that makes the sky a dark blue. However, that angle almost never darkens the whole sky the same.
 
  • #13
MrJimH said:
Why is the sky polarized?

I can't tell you 'why', but I can tell you the mechanism- Mie scattering.

http://www.polarization.com/sky/sky.html

(looks like someone else found that link also)

The degree of polarization is greatest 90 degrees (right angles to) the sun, is greatest on a clear day, and some people can see the effect (Haidinger's brush). Bees navigate using polarization.
 
  • #14
Integral said:
This is not an indication of polarization. You will get that effect with circularly polarized light. Read Redbelly's reply.
How is this not an indication of polarization?

I read RedBelly's reply.

Or did you mean this is not an indication of a specific kind of polarization? The OP did not specify.
 
  • #15
Circularly polarized light means it has no specific constant component of polarization. If When a beam of sun light passes through a polarizing filter 50% of the light is adsorbed by the filter, 50% passes through and emerges as polarized light. It is this 50% loss that you see in your pictures.

If you rotate your cameras polarizing filter by 90deg you will not see a change in the intensity of the light emerging.

If you, on a bright sunny day stand facing your shadow, and look at the sky through a polarizing filter you can orient it to any angle and not observe a change in intensity. Now do a 90 deg turn (for the military guys , Right face!) now when you observe the sky through a polarizing filter you WILL observe a change in intensity by changing the orientation of your filter. This is because you cannot observe the axis of the beam oscillating directly toward you, but see the transverse portion of the beam.

I am not real happy with my wording on that. Perhaps someone else can chime in.
 
  • #16
Camera polarizing filters do offer variable attenuation of linearly polarized light, and the transmission will change with the orientation of the polarizer. They are helpful in reducing the glare in reflections, and as DaveC noted help with darkening the sky. I have observed these effects personally.

That being said, Integral is correct in that they are circular polarizers. (Or at least that is what they are called.) What I think they are is a linear polarizer + a quarter-wave plate; the wave plate converts the linearly polarized light that is transmitted by the polarizer into circularly polarized light. (*** see comment below)

The linear polarizer would reduce reflected glare, and help with making the sky darker. The only benefit of the circular polarizer that I can think of is that it creates an even mix of the two linear polarizations, so that the reflectivity and transmissivity of the SLR optics (which are polarization dependent) would be the same as for unpolarized light, i.e. what the camera optics are designed for.

*** What I don't understand is, how does one create circularly polarized white light? Quarter-waveplates should only work for specific wavelengths, not a broad range. But that is getting off-topic from this thread, so I may just start a new thread (after some googling) to pose that question.
 
  • #17
Light scattered away from any incident beams is partially plane polarised and light scattered through 90 degrees is completely plane polarised.Here the light source is the sun and the wavelengths most strongly scattered are closer to the blue region of the spectrum.On a cloudless(ideally) day look at the sky at different angles through a piece of polaroid which you rotate.Looking vertically upwards is quite effective.
 
  • #18
Let's see if I can remember this from my EM class. It's been a while.

Well, imagine you are looking at the sky 90 degrees from the direction the sun's rays are traveling. The light that reaches your eyes was scattered from something (dust, air, etc.) in the sky. If we treat this something as an electric dipole, we can see why the light must be polarized.

First, if the dipole is aligned in the direction the sun's rays are traveling, it will not radiate. EM-waves are transverse, so the electric field can't oscillate the dipole.

Second, if the dipole is aligned with your line of sight, it will radiate, but not toward you. This is because of the angular dependence of dipole radiation. See reference below or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dipole_antenna

Lastly, we are left with one final direction perpendicular to your line of sight as well as the direction of the sun's rays. Dipoles aligned in this direction will radiate strongly toward you. The light scattered from these dipoles is polarized in the direction of the dipoles.

A little thought will show that light scattered from other directions will be less and less polarized until, when looking directly at the sun (erhm, well, to the side of the sun; don't look right at it :-p ) the light is not polarized at all.

For more info, check out David J. Griffiths: "Introduction to Electrodynamics" Third Edition Chapter 11 pg. 449 (Actually, the whole chapter's pretty interesting. :smile: )
 
  • #19
Integral said:
If you rotate your cameras polarizing filter by 90deg you will not see a change in the intensity of the light emerging.

That is not true- rotating linear polarizer while imaging the sky will indeed produce very profound optical effects. These are very visible using wide-angle lenses; there is a dark band in the sky that appears.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K