I How Does Rotating Polarization Work in Optics Experiments?

AI Thread Summary
In optics experiments, a common configuration involves using a quarter-wave plate (QWP) and a mirror to rotate the polarization of a linearly polarized laser beam by 90 degrees. The discussion highlights that while circular polarization's handedness typically changes upon reflection, the setup allows for the final reflected beam to maintain its polarization state due to the QWP's orientation. The reflected circularly polarized beam undergoes another transformation through the QWP, resulting in linear polarization that is perpendicular to the original beam. This mechanism is explained by the relationship between helicity and the reflection process, where the fast axis of the QWP is perceived differently upon reflection. Overall, this configuration effectively rotates the polarization by an angle of π/2.
ynyin
Messages
3
Reaction score
2
In optics experiments, I often see the following optics configuration to rotate the polarization of an incident linearly-polarized laser beam. The final reflected beam has its polarization rotated by 90 degrees. My question is:
1) Between the quarter plate and the mirror( reflecting surface), the following figure indicates the handness of the circular polarization does not change when it is reflected back. But from what I learned, the polarization should change its handness while being reflected by a mirror. (see, e.g. this question: https://physics.stackexchange.com/q...se-polarization-of-circularly-polarised-light)

2) If the circular polarization changes its handness, then after the quaterplate it should become the same linear polarization as the incident laser beam, meaning that it should pass through the PBS again and not be refleted away.

Where could I be wrong in understanding its principle? Thanks!

1653082680313.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd need a bit more context to understand the depicted optical setup. Where is the picture from?
 
vanhees71 said:
I'd need a bit more context to understand the depicted optical setup. Where is the picture from?
Thanks for the reply. There are quite some occasions where this optics configuration is used, see, for example:
1) The picture is from Figure 14 in this link:
https://www.edmundoptics.com/knowledge-center/application-notes/optics/understanding-waveplates/

2) http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/phyopt/cdopt.html#c3

3) http://www.jg-intl.com/cp/html/?85.html
 
Through 2) it became clear what the picture in 1) means: You have an incoming unpolarized beam hitting a polarizing beam splitter (PBS) and use one of the beams, which now is linearly polarized. This linearly polarized light goes through a quarter-wave plate (QWP) making it circular polarized. Depending on the polarization of the used linearly polarized beam (H or V) the outgoing beam is L or R circular polarized after the QWP. The now circular polarized beam is reflected. Circular polarization means the light is in a helicity eigenstate, and a reflection flips helicity. The reason is that helicity is a pseudoscalar: Helicity is ##\vec{k} \cdot \vec{J}/|\vec{k}|##, where ##\vec{k}## is the wave vector and ##\vec{J}## the angular momentum of the electromagnetic wave. Under a reflection ##\vec{k}## flips sign (polar vector), while ##\vec{J}### doesn't (axial vector). Thus if you have a L (R) circular polarized incoming beam the relected one is R (L) polarized. Now this goes again through the QWP making it linearly polarized in the perpendicular direction than that of the before incoming beam. At the PBS it still stays in this same perpendicular direction, i.e., the entire apparatus rotates the polarization by an angle of ##\pi/2##.
 
vanhees71 said:
Through 2) it became clear what the picture in 1) means: You have an incoming unpolarized beam hitting a polarizing beam splitter (PBS) and use one of the beams, which now is linearly polarized. This linearly polarized light goes through a quarter-wave plate (QWP) making it circular polarized. Depending on the polarization of the used linearly polarized beam (H or V) the outgoing beam is L or R circular polarized after the QWP. The now circular polarized beam is reflected. Circular polarization means the light is in a helicity eigenstate, and a reflection flips helicity. The reason is that helicity is a pseudoscalar: Helicity is ##\vec{k} \cdot \vec{J}/|\vec{k}|##, where ##\vec{k}## is the wave vector and ##\vec{J}## the angular momentum of the electromagnetic wave. Under a reflection ##\vec{k}## flips sign (polar vector), while ##\vec{J}### doesn't (axial vector). Thus if you have a L (R) circular polarized incoming beam the relected one is R (L) polarized. Now this goes again through the QWP making it linearly polarized in the perpendicular direction than that of the before incoming beam. At the PBS it still stays in this same perpendicular direction, i.e., the entire apparatus rotates the polarization by an angle of ##\pi/2##.
Thanks for the explanation! The flipping of the handness of the circular polarization (from L to R or R to L) is something I have thought about, and that is why I think the figure shows the circular polarization wrongly. The question now is why after QWP the linear polarization is perpendicular to that of the incoming beam. Fortunately, I got the answer from StackExchange, the key point is that the reflected beam sees the fast axis of the QWP at an angle rotated by 90 degrees w.r.t what it sees when it is incoming. Hope that also clarifies something for you.
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Back
Top