How Does Separating the Foci Affect the Shape of a Spheroid?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DaveC426913
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the geometric implications of separating the foci of a spheroid, specifically transitioning from a sphere to a prolate spheroid. The user begins with a unit sphere and explores the effects of moving its foci apart by two units, questioning the resulting semi-major and semi-minor axes lengths. Key conclusions include the realization that the distance from the focus to the surface decreases as the spheroid stretches, and the need to maintain a constant volume of 4/3π while adjusting the axes. The eccentricity formula, e² = 1 - (a²/c²), is referenced but initially misunderstood.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic geometry concepts, particularly ellipses and spheres.
  • Familiarity with the properties of prolate spheroids.
  • Knowledge of the relationship between focal distance and axes in conic sections.
  • Basic grasp of volume calculations for spheres and ellipsoids.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical properties of prolate spheroids and their equations.
  • Study the derivation and application of the eccentricity formula for spheroids.
  • Explore volume preservation techniques in geometric transformations.
  • Investigate the implications of varying focal distances on spheroid shapes and surface properties.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, writers incorporating geometric concepts into narratives, and students studying advanced geometry or conic sections.

DaveC426913
Gold Member
Messages
24,160
Reaction score
8,289
A story I wrote depends on some geometry, and I want to get it straight.

Assumptions:
1] The 2D math that applies to circles and ellipses is analagous to the 3D math for spheres and ellipsoids in the ways relevant to the rest of my post.
2] An ellipse is a circle whose two foci are co-incident. Thus, a sphere is an ellipsoid whose two foci are co-incient.

What I want to figure out is what happens to the surface of an ellipse/ellipsoid when the two co-incident foci are moved apart.

Say I have a sphere of unit radius. I move its two foci two units apart. What happens to the surface?
What is the length of its semi-minor axis?
What is the length of its semi-major axis?

And, more specifically, what happens to the distance from focus-to-surface near the "ends"?
Does the distance from focus to surface decrease as the ellipsoid "stretches" thinner? (i.e. is the focus now closer to the surface than one unit?)[ EDIT ] The correct term for my shape is a prolate spheroid - a cigar shape**. Equatorial radii a and b are the same. Polar radius c is longer.

** by magical coincidence, I am writing this while smoking a cigar.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
DaveC426913 said:
Say I have a sphere of unit radius. I move its two foci two units apart. What happens to the surface?
What is the length of its semi-minor axis?
What is the length of its semi-major axis?
Same as in the two-dimensional case. The ellipsoid you get in that way is the ellipse rotated around the symmetry axis. Note that not all ellipsoids can be produced that way - you are limited to those with one large axis and two identical smaller axes.
I wonder what shape you get if you require the sum of distances to three (instead of two) points to be constant. The two-dimensional shape can be egg-like. Another egg.
 
mfb said:
Same as in the two-dimensional case. The ellipsoid you get in that way is the ellipse rotated around the symmetry axis.
Right. Which is what?

(The only reason I mentioned the 2D case is so that, when I set up some details in my story, I can sketch the simpler 2D geometry. I don't have to wory about whether 3D geometry has different behavior).
 
The end-result of my question is this: as the two foci separate, does the focus-to-surface distance (what was a moment ago, the radius) at the pole decrease to less than one unit?
 
Last edited:
DaveC426913 said:
** by magical coincidence, I am writing this while smoking a cigar.
... as long as the NFL is off season ...
DaveC426913 said:
The end-result of my question is this: as the two foci separate, does the focus-to-surface distance (what was a moment ago, the radius) at the pole decrease to less than one unit?
I have a question. Why isn't the equation for the eccentricity ##e^2 = 1 - \frac{a^2}{c^2}## from Wiki (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spheroid) not the answer because the planar foci are ##(0,±e)##?
 
Ah. OK. Once I drew it out, it was pretty simple. Should have started with that.

elliptoid.png

So, the distance I was looking for was BP = .5
 
Shoot. So THAT's a problem. The above ellipse assumes that it is the radii that remain constant. It can not grow larger than a major axis of 2. At that point, it degenerates to a line. That's useless to me.

I'm going to need to redo it using 3D volume as a constant.

So, a sphere of one unit radius has a volume of 4/3π. I need to find the major and minor axes of a prolate elliptoid with a volume of 4/3π whose foci are one unit apart.Volume of sphere s = 4/3π*r3
Volume of prolate elliptoid e = 4/3π*a2c

e=s
4/3π*r3 = 4/3π*a2c
r=a2c
a2c = 1

Hm. Missing something here...
I need to specify a as a ratio of c.

How does the focal separation relate to the major and minor axes?
More specifically, how can I specify a and c so that the foci are one unit apart?
 
Last edited:
fresh_42 said:
I have a question. Why isn't the equation for the eccentricity ##e^2 = 1 - \frac{a^2}{c^2}## from Wiki (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spheroid) not the answer
No idea, sorry.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K