How Does Speed Affect Car Stopping Distance?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the minimum stopping distance for a car traveling at different speeds, specifically comparing 30 m/s and 41 m/s. The original poster provides initial calculations based on a known stopping distance and reaction time.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between speed and stopping distance, questioning the validity of using uniform motion equations in scenarios involving acceleration. There are attempts to calculate stopping distances based on initial conditions and reaction times.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing feedback on the original poster's calculations and questioning the appropriateness of the equations used. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need for different equations due to acceleration after the initial reaction time.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on using a specific template for responses, and some participants note the importance of correctly applying equations relevant to the situation involving deceleration.

HaLAA
Messages
85
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


the minimum distance for a car traveling at a speed of 30m/s is 60 m, including the distance traveled during the driver's reaction time of 0.44s. what is the minimum stopping distance for the same car traveling at the speed of 41m/s?

v=30m/s, s=60m
drivers' reaction time = 0.44s

2. The attempt at a solution
because the car traveling at a speed of 30m/s and the distance is 60m, so I find the traveling time 60m/30m/s=2s, and the driver's reaction time is 0.44s, thus the entire stopping time is 2s-0.44s=1.56s.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
60m / 30 m/s is indeed 2 s. After, say 1.5 seconds, is the speed still 30 m/s ? In other words: can you really use the equation you are using in the case described ? Or do you need some other equations ?

Oh, and: wecome to PF :-)

Jsut so you know: using the template is mandatory. And the template has 1, 2 and 3. Especially 2 is of interest in your situation.
 
BvU said:
60m / 30 m/s is indeed 2 s. After, say 1.5 seconds, is the speed still 30 m/s ? In other words: can you really use the equation you are using in the case described ? Or do you need some other equations ?

Oh, and: wecome to PF :)

Jsut so you know: using the template is mandatory. And the template has 1, 2 and 3. Especially 2 is of interest in your situation.
the entire travling timie is 2s, I am sure. Then at the end the travel the speed I think is 0 m/s. So I think I can do

0=a*1.56s+30 m/s to fine the a which is -19m/s/s. Because it is the same car, I think the acceleration is the same.
thus, the distance at 41m/s, I think it should be 0.44s*41m/s+ 1/2*(-19m/s/s*(1.56s)2)+41m/s*1.56s
 
the entire traveling time is 2s, I am sure
No, it is not. Fill in 30 m/s instead of 41 m/s in your last expression and you don't get 60 m.

So, no template used, and still I have given some assistance. I hope I don't get banned from PF for doing so.
Perhaps I haven't made clear that, although I conceded that 60 m / 30 m/s = 2 s, that is the wrong equation to use.
That is also the argument for wanting you to use the template: That equation you don't provide applies to uniform motion with constant velocity, no acceleration therefore. So it does NOT apply to the situation after 0.44 s.

All remaining steps you make are impeccable: you can indeed assume that the deceleration for different speeds is the same and your last expression is just fine. Now find the right a.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K