How Does Spring Coil Count Affect Shock Absorber Performance?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the design of a spring for a shock absorber, focusing on how the number of coils affects performance under load. Participants explore calculations related to spring constants, load capacities, and design constraints, with a particular emphasis on applications in vehicle suspension systems.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that reducing the number of coils increases the load needed to deflect the spring, questioning the relationship between coil count and deflection.
  • Another participant explains that more turns in a coil spring lead to more twisting under load, resulting in greater deflection and a weaker spring.
  • A participant expresses confusion about calculating strain energy and its relation to the maximum load the spring needs to absorb.
  • One suggestion is to start with known parameters and constraints to calculate spring rate and free length before designing the spring.
  • A participant calculates the spring constant based on a static reaction force and questions whether the spring should be sized to handle the entire shock load.
  • Another participant emphasizes the need for a diagram and a clearer description of the problem to better understand the spring forces involved.
  • A participant describes the specific application involving a trailer and the forces acting on it, expressing difficulty in finding suitable stock springs for the calculated loads.
  • One suggestion is to define vehicle speed and bump characteristics to design the suspension effectively, rather than solely relying on static load calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the relationship between coil count and spring performance, as well as the appropriate approach to designing a spring for a vehicle suspension. No consensus is reached on the best method or calculations to use.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various assumptions and constraints, such as maximum load, static reaction forces, and the need for specific design parameters. There is also a lack of clarity regarding the relationship between spring design and dynamic loading conditions.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students or professionals involved in mechanical engineering, particularly those focused on suspension design and spring mechanics.

Mechaman
Messages
37
Reaction score
1
Hi All,

I'm trying to design a spring for use in a shock absorber for a college project but my calculations aren't making any sense. I know this is a big ask, but if anyone knows about this stuff I'd appreciate a look.

The maximum load is 16.5kN and when it's sitting it will be 5.5kN The overall height is about 400mm and the rest can be anything needed to get the load value.

It looks like when I lower the number of coils (revolutions) the load needed to deflect the spring increases. This seems wrong, surely more material means more force to deflect?

I have an excel sheet I've been working on with values on there and the relevant pages on coils copied into it (bottom left hand side) if anyone cares to try it?

https://1drv.ms/x/s!ArXz3GkpwfgW02B07v7QxRxfQI0m
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The wire in a coil spring is subject to torsion when the spring is loaded. The spring wire twists under load. More turns makes for longer wire, which twists more under the same load. More twist under the same load means the spring deflects more. More deflection under the same load is a weaker spring.

A good way to verify your calculations is to look up some springs from a manufacturer such as Lee Spring (www.leespring.com) and compare to your calculations. The catalog may not give the number of active turns, but you can calculate that from the solid height and number of end turns.
 
Ok thanks I think I understand that part. I was using the formula for finding w but I should be finding strain energy.

If strain energy is measured in n/m how would I say it needs to absorb 16kN at that point? Would the moment of the spring at radius R to the mean of the wire be what takes the point load at the centre of the spring?
 
It sounds like you are overthinking this problem. Start with your knowns and constraints: force at displacement, solid height, free length, max or min ID and/or OD, etc. Then use that information to calculate spring rate (kN/m) and free length.

Then, and only then, start designing your spring. Your variables can include wire diameter, number of active turns, and OD. Then check stress at peak load. Iterate as needed.
 
I have a static reaction force of the wheel at 5.5kN. The shock load will be around 16.5kN. Even at 5.5kN and 200mm travel I'm getting:

k = 5.5kN / 0.2
k = 2.75kN/m
k = 2750N/m
k = 2750000N/mm

The largest spring I see is rated at 437N/mm here https://www.leespring.com//product_spec.asp?partnum=LHL2000D01&springType=C&subType=

Am I right to be sizing the spring to take the entire shock load? I was under the impression the spring takes the full load then the damper dissipates the energy to slow oscillation?
 
It is unclear what problem you are really trying to solve. It's time for a diagram that describes the problem. Then describe in words, not equations, how you came up with your spring forces.
 
The problem is a trailer with 2 wheels at the back and one at the front. I used statics to find the reaction force for each axle. The front comes in at 5.5kN. The G force then if hitting a bump I'm setting to 3 gs. 5.5kN * 3 = 16.5kN maximum load at the front axle.

The spring and shock being looked at is <400mm in length and can be any other variable.

So far all attempts at getting a realistic answer have not worked out, seems that the load 16.5kN is way too much and the even 5.5kN seems unrealistic for finding stock springs. Looks like I'm doing something wrong?

Static equation below:
7cHRWs8.png

LwdUGhP.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-1-9_16-57-1.png
    upload_2018-1-9_16-57-1.png
    15 KB · Views: 612
  • upload_2018-1-9_17-1-59.png
    upload_2018-1-9_17-1-59.png
    13.8 KB · Views: 663
  • upload_2018-1-9_17-2-20.png
    upload_2018-1-9_17-2-20.png
    15 KB · Views: 596
  • upload_2018-1-9_17-2-41.png
    upload_2018-1-9_17-2-41.png
    15 KB · Views: 593
  • 7cHRWs8.png
    7cHRWs8.png
    22.6 KB · Views: 505
  • LwdUGhP.png
    LwdUGhP.png
    12.5 KB · Views: 445
If you are trying to design a suspension for a vehicle, the better approach is to define a speed and a bump, then design the suspension to absorb that bump with a defined peak displacement or peak acceleration of the vehicle. A very quick Google search using the terms road vehicle acceleration bumps came up with this: http://www.archiwummotoryzacji.pl/images/AM/vol67/vol67-janczur-en-47-60.pdf. When designing a suspension, the peak acceleration of your vehicle is the result of a speed and a bump, not an input.

Your wheel load is roughly comparable to that of an American full size pickup truck. Take a look at some large cars or trucks to get an idea of the sizes of spring used, then measure up a few springs, and calculate their spring constants. That will give you a starting point and a sanity check.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
Replies
10
Views
7K