I How Does Technetium-99 Appear in Red Giants Beyond the Iron Peak?

jjson775
Messages
102
Reaction score
23
TL;DR Summary
Technetium 99 was detected in a red giant in 1952. Was this produced by nuclear fusion?
Technetium 99 was detected by spectroscopy in a red giant. How did it get there if it is heavier than the “iron peak”, the upper limit for fusion?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To add, this is called the s-process, where heavy elements in the star absorb neutrons.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke and Astronuc
mfb said:
Iron/nickel is the limit where fusion releases energy. Fusion processes continue beyond that, they just don't release energy any more but need energy input.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R-process
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S-process
My question arose from a straightforward problem showing how the technetium could not have been present in the star from the beginning, because of radioactive decay. To test my understanding, the technetium was formed in the star by the endoergic s-process. Elements up to the iron peak can be created by ordinary fusion. Probably an oversimplification on my part.
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top