How does plasma act outside of a containment field?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the behavior of plasma when removed from containment fields such as tokamaks or stellarators, particularly its interaction with the atmosphere and potential applications or implications of such behavior. Participants consider various scenarios, including the characteristics of hot plasma and its physical properties in different contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that unconfined plasma would behave like any gas, diffusing into the atmosphere and reacting with its surroundings.
  • Others argue that upon release, plasma would cool and recombine almost instantly, potentially resulting in a bright flash of light.
  • A participant mentions a technique called "massive gas injection" used in tokamak experiments to quickly quench plasma during disruptions, highlighting the rapid cooling process.
  • There is speculation about the density of plasma compared to air, with one participant noting that plasma is typically much less dense and would expand rapidly if released.
  • Some participants discuss the energy content of plasma, with calculations suggesting that a significant amount of kinetic energy could be released if a large quantity of plasma were to escape.
  • Concerns are raised regarding the feasibility of using plasma as a weapon, with one participant suggesting that uncontained plasma would not be able to be directed at a target effectively.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the behavior of plasma outside of containment, with no consensus on its potential applications or implications. Some agree on the basic properties of plasma as a gas, while others explore more speculative scenarios regarding energy release and weaponization.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the limitations of their discussions, including assumptions about plasma density, energy calculations, and the conditions under which plasma behaves as described. The discussion does not resolve the complexities involved in the behavior of plasma in atmospheric conditions.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying plasma physics, engineering applications of plasma, or theoretical implications of plasma behavior in various contexts.

Kiwimaster76
Messages
19
Reaction score
4
If you were to have some way to remove plasma out of a tokamak or stellarator, how would it act? I realize there's basically no way to actually remove plasma from those machines, but I'm curious how plasma would act in the actual atmosphere. Would it act like a plasma cutter? Would it stay somewhat together? Would it just dissipate into super heated air instantly?

Also say it was a heavier than air plasma, plasma for the sake of it and not for nuclear fusion, would it pool like a liquid? Also assume its a hot plasma, approaching nuclear fusion levels of heat?

I realize this is an odd question and I may not be explaining what I want to know correctly, however I would appreciate anyone who took the time to answer!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Plasmas are just ionized gases. An unconfined plasma will behave the same as any gas released into the atmosphere: it would flow with and diffuse into its surroundings. The only real difference would be its susceptibility to electromagnetic fields and tendency to react with it's surroundings and deionize without an energy and confinement source.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kiwimaster76
Ah ok, thank you!
 
Kiwimaster76 said:
If you were to have some way to remove plasma out of a tokamak or stellarator, how would it act? I realize there's basically no way to actually remove plasma from those machines, but I'm curious how plasma would act in the actual atmosphere. Would it act like a plasma cutter? Would it stay somewhat together? Would it just dissipate into super heated air instantly?
The plasma would cool down and recombine almost instantly, in a bright flash of light. In fact, there is a technique called "massive gas injection" which is being used in tokamak experiments to quickly shut down a plasma in case there is a loss of plasma control which will lead to a "disruption". Disruptions occur somewhat frequently in tokamak experiments and do some damage to the walls. With massive gas injection, a valve opens when plasma control is lost and quenches the plasma in milliseconds, reducing the damage to the walls.

Kiwimaster76 said:
Also say it was a heavier than air plasma, plasma for the sake of it and not for nuclear fusion, would it pool like a liquid? Also assume its a hot plasma, approaching nuclear fusion levels of heat?
Plasma is normally much less dense than air. In a tokamak, there is only around a microgram of plasma in the chamber. You can use PV=nRT here: if P is kept somewhat constant, then for very large T, n/V will be very small. In fact, tokamaks often have plasma pressures quite similar to the atmospheric pressure. The pressure would have to be much larger for the density to be large, which means that it would expand immediately if it was released outside (in a big explosion). Plasma is more like a gas than a liquid.

You can have pooling of heavy gases (like chlorine in trenches-- sorry for the example), but thermonuclear plasmas are too energetic to pool under Earth gravity. The thermal velocity is greater than the escape velocity.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and Kiwimaster76
Oh! that's exactly what I was wanting to know! Thank you so much for the help!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Keep in mind, an "explosion" of one microgram worth of plasma is pretty minor. It's not tiny, as it would have similar energy to a gram of TNT, but it's not going to knock down a building or anything.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kiwimaster76
Ohh ok, so say if it was about 100 grams of plasma that escaped, it would be similar to about a hundred kilograms of TNT? Theoretically since I doubt there are any current ways to store that much plasma.
 
If a hydrogen plasma has a temperature of (10 keV)/##k_B## = 116 MK, then that works out to about 3 GJ of kinetic energy per gram. Just use
##E = 3/2 k_B T n##
where n is the number of protons + electrons, since at this temperature hydrogen is ionized.
 
Wait so would all of this kinetic energy be turned into an explosion? Because if that's so then 100 grams of plasma at that temperature has about as much energy as 71.7 tons of TNT. For comparison when Mythbusters made diamonds they used about 2.5 tons of a TNT equivalent. 100 grams of plasma has about 28.75 times that energy if that kinetic energy goes to an explosion. That makes me wonder about all the sci-fi weapons that if were actually attempted would end in massive explosions before it even fired.

A video of that explosion here.
 
  • #10
I can't see how plasma could be used as a weapon. (other than thermonuclear bombs which already exist).
Once it is uncontained it's going to rapidly degenerate into normal atoms with a lot of heat emission, but an uncontained plasma can't be targetted at anything in particular.
 
  • #11
Ah I see
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K