How does the characteristic of a field affect symmetric bilinear forms?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DUET
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forms Symmetric
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the characteristics of fields and their implications for symmetric bilinear forms. Participants explore the definitions and properties of fields, particularly focusing on the significance of a field's characteristic being either 0 or 2, and how this affects operations within the field.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about a statement regarding fields with characteristic not equal to 2, seeking clarification on its implications for symmetric bilinear forms.
  • Another participant provides a detailed definition of a field, explaining the axioms that govern its structure and the concept of field characteristic, including examples of fields with characteristic 0 and 2.
  • A participant elaborates on the meaning of the operations "+" and "·" in the context of fields, explaining how they relate to ordered pairs and the function definitions.
  • There is a mention of the mathematical property that if a field has characteristic n, then n must be a prime number, although this point is not universally accepted or elaborated upon by all participants.
  • One participant highlights the advantage of assuming a field is not of characteristic 0, noting that this allows for division by 1 + 1, which is significant in the context of symmetric bilinear forms.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the definitions and properties of fields, but there is no consensus on the implications of these characteristics for symmetric bilinear forms, as some points remain contested or unclear.

Contextual Notes

Some participants have not fully addressed the implications of field characteristics on symmetric bilinear forms, leaving certain assumptions and mathematical steps unresolved.

DUET
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
When I start to read the the article called "symmetric bi-linear forms", I face the following sentence. But I don't understand what does the following sentence suggest. Could someone please help me here?

We will now assume that the characteristic of our field is not 2 (so 1 + 1 is not = to 0)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A field is a very general object. It is a set ##F## together with two functions ##+:F\times F\rightarrow F## and ##\cdot:F\times F\rightarrow F## satisfying:

  • ##a+(b+c) = (a+b)+c##
  • ##a+b=b+a##
  • There exists a ##0\in F## such that ##a+0 = 0+a = a##
  • For each ##a\in F##, there is an element ##b\in F## such that ##a+b=b+a=0##
  • ##a\cdot(b\cdot c) = (a\cdot b)\cdot c##
  • ##a\cdot b = b\cdot a##
  • There exists an ##1\in F## such that ##1\neq 0## and ##a\cdot 1 = 1\cdot a = a##
  • If ##a\neq 0##, then there exists a ##b\in F## such that ##a\cdot b =b\cdot a = 1##

The usual suspects, such as ##\mathbb{Q}##, ##\mathbb{R}## and ##\mathbb{C}## are fields. All of these fields satisfy that ##1+1+1+1+1+...+1## (n times) is nonzero. But this is not a general property of a field. Fields that have the property are said to be of characteristic 0.

For example, consider ##F=\{0,1\}## and define

[tex]1+0 = 0+1 = 1~\text{and}~1+1=0+0=0[/tex]

and

[tex]1\cdot 0 = 0\cdot 0 = 0\cdot 1 = 0~\text{and}~1\cdot 1 = 1[/tex]

This satisfies all the field axioms, but it has ##1+1=0##. We say that this field has characteristic 2.

In general, if a field satisfies ##1+1+1+...+1=0## (n times). Then the field is said to have characteristic ##n##. We can always show that ##n## is a prime number.

The main advantage of assuming that the field is not of characteristic ##0##, is that we can divide by ##1+1##. If we use the nice notation ##2=1+1##, then ##1/2## exists.
 
micromass said:
A field is a very general object. It is a set ##F## together with two functions ##+:F\times F\rightarrow F## and ##\cdot:F\times F\rightarrow F##
Could you please explain it a bit more?Specially the following.

micromass said:
##+:F\times F\rightarrow F## and ##\cdot:F\times F\rightarrow F##
What do you mean by "+" and "."?
 
The cartesian product ##F\times F## just means the set of all ordered pairs. Thus

[tex]F\times F = \{(a,b)~\vert~a,b\in F\}[/tex]

For example ##(0,0)\in \mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{R}## and ##(-1,2)\in \mathbb{R}\times \mathbb{R}##.

That ##f## is a function from ##F\times F## to ##F## just means that we associate with each element in ##F\times F##, an element in ##F##.

So given ##(a,b)## with ##a,b\in F##, we associate an element ##f(a,b)\in F##. Specifically, if ##f## is ##+##, then to each ordered pair ##(a,b)## with ##a,b\in F##, we associate ##+(a,b)## in ##F##. We write this as ##a+b##.

So to each two elements in ##F##, we just associate a new element in ##F##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K