What is the Matrix of a Non-Degenerate Non-Symmetric Bilinear Form?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the properties of a non-degenerate non-symmetric bilinear form F in a vector space V. It establishes that there exists a basis in V such that F can be represented by specific matrices: H_{\phi}, J, and K. The proof involves decomposing F into symmetric and skew-symmetric components, leading to the conclusion that if the dimension of the kernel of the skew-symmetric part F_{-} is greater than 1, F must be symmetric, which contradicts the initial conditions. Thus, the dimension of the kernel must be exactly 1.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of bilinear forms and their properties
  • Knowledge of matrix representation of linear transformations
  • Familiarity with concepts of symmetric and skew-symmetric matrices
  • Basic linear algebra, including vector spaces and dimensions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of non-degenerate bilinear forms in linear algebra
  • Learn about the decomposition of bilinear forms into symmetric and skew-symmetric components
  • Explore matrix representations of linear transformations in detail
  • Investigate the implications of kernel dimensions in linear mappings
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of linear algebra, and researchers interested in bilinear forms and their applications in vector spaces.

Dmak
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hello I was reading through some research and I came across the proof of a lemma which I did not wholly understand. The problem statement is as follows:

Let F be a non-degenerate non-symmetic bilinear form in V. Then there exists a basis in V with respect to which F has one of the following matrices:

[tex]H_{\phi} = <br /> \[ \left( \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> cos \phi & sin \phi & 0 \\<br /> -sin \phi & cos \phi & 0 \\<br /> 0 & 0 & 1 \end{array} \right)\], J = \[ \left( \begin{array}{ccc} 1& 1 & 0 \\ -1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \end{array} \right)\], K = \[ \left( \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 1 & 1 & 0 \\<br /> -1 & 0 & 1 \\<br /> 0 & 1 & 0 \end{array} \right)\] [/tex].

First we decompose F into the sum of a symmetric and a skew symmetric form, [tex]F = F_{+} + F_{-}[/tex]. The proof then makes the assumption that [tex]dim \; ker \; F_{-}= 1[/tex]. It seems that the dimension could equally be 2. Any ideas why this is the case? Or better yet can anyone offer another proof of this lemma? Thank you for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess ##\dim V =3##. In this case, if ##\dim \ker F_->1##, then ##F## will be symmetric, which is excluded.

Let ##\{\,u,v,w\,\}## be a basis with ##v,w \in \ker F_-##. Then ##u^\tau Fv=u^\tau F_+v=v^\tau Fu## and similar for ##w##. If all three are in the kernel, or for ##v^\tau Fw## we have zero anyway.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K