How Does the Clausius-Clapeyron Equation Derive the Slope -ΔHvap/RT?

  • Thread starter Thread starter courtrigrad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Clausius-clapeyron
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 10K views
courtrigrad
Messages
1,236
Reaction score
2
I know that the relationship between pressure and temperature for an ideal gas is linear. The relationship between vapor pressure and temperature for a liquid, however, is exponential. To make it linear we take the natural log and end up with: [tex]\ln P = -\frac{\Delta H_{vap}}{RT} + b[/tex]. How did we get [tex]-\frac{\Delta H_{vap}}{RT}[/tex] to be the slope? The y-axis is [tex]\ln P[/tex] and the x-axis is [tex]\frac{1000}{T}[/tex].

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
anybody have any ideas?

thanks
 
I'm not sure what your question really is but if you plot lnP vs 1000/T the slope will be

[tex]-\frac{\Delta H_{vap}}{1000 R}[/tex]
 
plugpoint said:
To make it linear we take the natural log and end up with: [tex]\ln P = -\frac{\Delta H_{vap}}{RT} + b[/tex]. How did we get [tex]-\frac{\Delta H_{vap}}{RT}[/tex] to be the slope? The y-axis is [tex]\ln P[/tex] and the x-axis is [tex]\frac{1000}{T}[/tex].
The slope will be whatever -Hvap/RT is divided by to get the x axis. If I have y=ab and I plot y vs b, the slope is a. If I plot y vs a, the slope is b. The only (theoretical) way you will get -Hvap/RT as the slope is if you plotted lnP vs 1, but this doesn't make any sense. So in conclusion, you will never get -Hvap/RT as your slope :smile:

Which variable are you trying to solve or prove something for?
 
The slope was actually [tex]\frac{\Delta H_{vap}}{R}[/tex]. I think it was meant to be written as: [tex]\ln P = -\frac{\Delta H_{vap}}{R}\frac{1}{T} + b[/tex]

Is this correct?

Thanks