MHB How Does the Composite Transformation H Affect a Triangle and Arrow?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lemonthree
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Transformations
lemonthree
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Given that
$$
H_{1} $$= reflection about the line y = x + 1;
$$H_{2} $$= counterclockwise rotation of pi/2 about the point (1,0);
$$H_{3} $$= translation by 1 - i.
What is the image of the triangle and arrow under the map $$ H = H_{1} *H_{2} * H_{3} $$?

I need help visualising the above transformation H. I know that $$ H = H_{1} *H_{2} * H_{3} $$, so we must perform the transformations from right to left (H3 first, then H2, and lastly H1). Now, in a question that provides the equation for $$ H_{1},H_{2} , H_{3} $$, I believe I can solve this by substituting the values into $$ H_{1},H_{2} , H_{3} $$ respectively. However, in this case, the question does not provide the equation and it is up to my visualisation.

I have attached photos showing my steps for each respectively. I have no trouble with translation (H3) as it is relatively easy to visualise.
However, I struggle a little for the rotation about (1,0). I can't quite visualise "pivoting" the arrow and triangle about (1,0)...I would like to ask for some tips to aid in visualising such rotations better.
 

Attachments

  • original.png
    original.png
    4.2 KB · Views: 113
  • H3.png
    H3.png
    4.2 KB · Views: 123
  • H2.png
    H2.png
    4.3 KB · Views: 139
  • H1.png
    H1.png
    7.6 KB · Views: 126
  • answer.JPG
    answer.JPG
    14.9 KB · Views: 105
Physics news on Phys.org
Red triangle shows the correct rotation of $\dfrac{\pi}{2}$ CCW. Yours appears to be in the CW direction.

54E20B4D-C6B8-4531-B74B-74F50F2F0EB6.jpeg
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
706
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K