How Does the Coriolis Effect Influence Acceleration on a Merry-Go-Round?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Coriolis effect and its influence on the acceleration of a ball on a merry-go-round. Participants clarify that while the ball's velocity appears constant from an external perspective, it experiences normal acceleration directed outward due to its circular path. The conversation highlights the distinction between constant speed and changing velocity, emphasizing that the Coriolis force does not affect speed, but the centrifugal pseudo-force does. Ultimately, the ball's acceleration with respect to the rotating frame of reference (##B##) is not zero, as it follows a curved trajectory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Coriolis effect in rotating frames of reference
  • Centrifugal pseudo-force in circular motion
  • Understanding of normal and tangential acceleration
  • Basic principles of classical mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical formulation of the Coriolis effect
  • Explore the relationship between centrifugal force and circular motion
  • Investigate normal vs. tangential acceleration in non-linear paths
  • Learn about inertial frames of reference in physics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of rotating systems and the implications of the Coriolis effect on motion.

Like Tony Stark
Messages
182
Reaction score
6
Homework Statement
Two boys are sitting diametrically opposite on a merry go round. The platform has a constant angular velocity. Then, the boy ##A## throws a ball to the boy ##B##. This ball has a horizontal velocity relative to the platform and directed to ##B##, and has no horizontal acceleration. What's the acceleration with respect to ##B## along the plane of the platform at the instant after thrown?
Relevant Equations
##\vec a=\vec a_B + \vec{\dot \omega} \times \vec r + \vec \omega \times (\vec \omega \times \vec r) + 2. (\vec \omega \times \vec v_{rel}) + \vec a_{rel}##
This is a tipical Coriolis effect example, and I know what the trajectory drawn by the ball looks like from the perspective of B, and from the perspective of someone outside. But the acceleration with respect to ##B## is 0, isn't it? Because the problem says "the ball has no horizontal acceleration". If not, what would it be? I guess it would be an acceleration pointing outside the platform because that would be the acceleration that moves the ball from the perspective of ##B##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Like Tony Stark said:
Coriolis effect example, and I know what the trajectory drawn by the ball looks like from the perspective of ##B##, and from the perspective of someone outside. But the acceleration with respect to ##B## is 0,

Do you see why the bolded phrases are contradictory? If ##B## perceives a path which is not straight in his frame of reference, then by definition the velocity can not be constant.

 
RPinPA said:
Do you see why the bolded phrases are contradictory? If ##B## perceives a path which is not straight in his frame of reference, then by definition the velocity can not be constant.

I didn't express myself correctly. Yes, it has an acceleration because it doesn't follow a straight line, so it must have an acceleration. But how would that acceleration be? Because the task says "what's the acceleration of the ball with respect to ##B##?#, which are its characteristics? It only has normal acceleration and not tangential because the velocity is constant, and it points outside the merry go round. Would that be ok?
 
Like Tony Stark said:
I didn't express myself correctly. Yes, it has an acceleration because it doesn't follow a straight line, so it must have an acceleration. But how would that acceleration be? Because the task says "what's the acceleration of the ball with respect to ##B##?#, which are its characteristics? It only has normal acceleration and not tangential because the velocity is constant, and it points outside the merry go round. Would that be ok?
I am having difficulty following the logic here.

We have already agreed that the velocity is not constant. So it seems that you mean that the speed is constant because Coriolis is the only force in play. Indeed, Coriolis is always perpendicular to the velocity vector and does not affect speed. But that ignores the centrifugal pseudo-force. Centrifugal force can affect speed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K