How does the Einstein tensor contribute to the equations of motion in 4d?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter alejandrito29
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Einstein Gauss Gravity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the role of the Einstein tensor in the equations of motion within the context of four-dimensional general relativity. Participants explore the implications of total derivatives, divergence-free tensors, and the relationship between the Einstein tensor and equations of motion, including the derivation of the Einstein equations from the action principle.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants reference a paper suggesting that in four dimensions, the Einstein tensor acts as a total derivative and thus does not contribute to the equations of motion.
  • Others argue that the Einstein tensor is derived from the variation of the action and is essential for obtaining the Einstein equations.
  • There is a discussion about whether a divergence-free tensor contributes to the equations of motion, with some asserting that terms which can be expressed as total divergences do not affect the equations.
  • Participants differentiate between the action for the field and the Lagrangian used to describe geodesics, noting that they yield different equations of motion.
  • Questions arise regarding the nature of the equations of motion in general relativity, with references to both the Einstein field equations and the geodesic equation.
  • One participant mentions that solutions to the field equations can be expressed in terms of the speed of a particle, indicating a connection to classical mechanics.
  • Another participant describes how to derive the geodesic equation using the Euler-Lagrange equations from a specific form of the Lagrangian.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the contribution of the Einstein tensor and divergence-free tensors to the equations of motion. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of total derivatives and the specific equations of motion in general relativity.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about the nature of divergence-free tensors and the specific forms of the action and Lagrangian used. The relationship between the Einstein tensor and equations of motion is not fully clarified, leading to ongoing debate.

alejandrito29
Messages
148
Reaction score
0
Hello, in a paper http://www-library.desy.de/preparch/conf/theo-ws/workshop2004/data/Chatillon.pdf .

says that.

1) In 4d, it is a total derivative, then does not contribute to the equations of motion

A total derivative respect to time does not contribute to equation of motion?, ¿or other parameter??

2) Only [tex]R^2[/tex] order combination giving equations of motion
with no derivatives of higher order than two and divergence free, like the Einstein tensor.

¿why einstein tensor gives equation of motion of second derivative of time?...I think that varying the action [tex]\int \sqrt{g_{uv}dx^u dx^v}[/tex] i get the equation of motion, but i don't understand but the einstein tensor too...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
alejandrito29, One way to derive the Einstein equations is to take as the action S = ∫√-g R, and vary this with respect to gμν. It turns out that δS/δgμν = √-g Gμν. It's generally true that for any action of the form S = ∫√-g L, where L is a scalar, that δS/δgμν will be a divergence-free tensor.

The paper considers adding to the Einstein action a term α(R2 − 4RμνRμν +RμνρσRμνρσ)

In four dimensions the variation of this additional term vanishes identically, so it makes no contribution to the equations of motion.
 
Bill_K said:
alejandrito29, One way to derive the Einstein equations is to take as the action S = ∫√-g R, and vary this with respect to gμν. It turns out that δS/δgμν = √-g Gμν. It's generally true that for any action of the form S = ∫√-g L, where L is a scalar, that δS/δgμν will be a divergence-free tensor.

The paper considers adding to the Einstein action a term α(R2 − 4RμνRμν +RμνρσRμνρσ)

In four dimensions the variation of this additional term vanishes identically, so it makes no contribution to the equations of motion.

very thank , but,
1. ¿a divergence-free tensor does not contribute to the equations of motion?

2. ¿the einstein tensor then does not contribute to the equations of motion?. I understand by Einstein equation [tex]G_{uv}= R_{uv}-\frac{1}{2}g_{uv}R=k T_{uv}[/tex] but by equation of motion [tex]\ddot{x} + \Gamma^v_{su} \dot{x}^s \dot{x}^u=0[/tex]
 
Last edited:
¿a divergence-free tensor does not contribute to the equations of motion?
¡I didn't say that! A term T in the Lagrangian which can be written as a total divergence, T = Vμ, does not contribute to the equations of motion. Lagrangians are not unique. Two Lagrangians that differ by a total divergence will yield exactly the same equations of motion.
¿the einstein tensor then does not contribute to the equations of motion?
You're confusing two things that have nothing to do with each other. S = ∫√-g R d4x is the action for the field, and its variation δS/δgμν yields the Einstein equations. ∫√gμνdxμdxν is a Lagrangian that can be used to describe geodesics, and its variation yields the equations of motion for a test particle.
 
Bill_K said:
You're confusing two things that have nothing to do with each other. S = ∫√-g R d4x is the action for the field, and its variation δS/δgμν yields the Einstein equations. ∫√gμνdxμdxν is a Lagrangian that can be used to describe geodesics, and its variation yields the equations of motion for a test particle.

ok, very very thanks, but
what is the equation of motion in general relativity? [tex]G_{uv}= k T_{uv}[/tex] or [tex]\ddot{x}+ \Gamma^u_{s v} \dot{x}^s \dot{x}^v[/tex] ?,

or other??
 
alejandrito29 said:
or other

The first proposition you give is the Einstein's field equation.
The second proposition, if vanishing, is the equation describing a parallel transported speed vector.
Solutions of the field equation is of the following type:
gab. va. vb = constant where v is the speed of the particle and where a, b = 0, 1, 2 and 3.
If you prefer a formulation like in classical mechanics, with forces, then you have to write the equation Dv = forces to recover the solutions.
 
If your lagrangian is of the form [tex]L = \frac{1}{2}g_{\mu \nu }\dot{x^{\mu }}\dot{x^{\nu }}[/tex] then you can use the euler lagrange equations [tex]\frac{\partial L}{\partial x^{\mu }} - \frac{\mathrm{d} }{\mathrm{d} \lambda }(\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{x^{\mu }}}) = 0[/tex] (where lambda is an affine parameter) to arrive at the geodesic equation [tex]\ddot{x}^{\mu } + \Gamma ^{\mu }_{\alpha \beta }\dot{x^{\alpha }}\dot{x^{\beta }} = 0[/tex] If you use the Einstein lagrangian [itex]L = (-g)^{1/2}R[/itex] then variation of the lagrangian will yield the vacuum field equations [itex]G^{\mu \nu } = 0[/itex] and the related bianchi identity [itex]\triangledown _{\mu }G^{\mu \nu } = 0[/itex].
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K