How Does the Heat Transfer Rate Affect a Beaker of Liquid Nitrogen?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the heat transfer rate affecting a beaker of liquid nitrogen, specifically addressing the decrease in mass of 46.3 g over 10 minutes. The specific latent heat of vaporization for nitrogen at its boiling point is 1.99 x 105 J/kg. The heat capacity of the beaker is deemed irrelevant because it acts as a thermal resistance and capacitance, with different temperatures on its inner and outer walls. The inner wall remains at the liquid nitrogen temperature while the outer wall is influenced by the surrounding air temperature.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of heat transfer principles
  • Familiarity with specific latent heat concepts
  • Knowledge of thermal resistance and capacitance
  • Basic grasp of thermodynamic equations, particularly E = mcΔT and E = ml
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of thermal resistance in materials
  • Learn about the coefficient of heat transfer for different materials
  • Explore transient and steady-state heat transfer conditions
  • Investigate the effects of ambient temperature on phase change processes
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in thermodynamics, physics educators, and anyone involved in heat transfer analysis or cryogenics will benefit from this discussion.

Jimmy87
Messages
692
Reaction score
19

Homework Statement


The mass of liquid nitrogen in an open beaker is found to have decreased by 46.3 g in 10 minutes. If the s.l.h of vaporisation of nitrogen at its boiling point is 1.99 x 105, at what rate were the surroundings heating the beaker? Why is the heat capacity of the beaker irrelevant?

Homework Equations


E = mc delta T
E = m l

The Attempt at a Solution


I am fine with the numerical answer but can't figure out the last part of the question. I would have thought that the specific heat capacity is relevant. I first thought it was irrelevant because the beaker and liquid nitrogen would be at the same temperature but then I thought surely the beaker must be at a higher temperature than the liquid nitrogen inside otherwise there would be no flow of heat? Also it must be higher because the temperature of the surroundings is higher again there would be a flow of heat to the beaker so the beaker's temperature must be changing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't think of the beaker as having a single temperature. It represent a thermal resistance and capacitance in a thermal circuit, and there are fixed temperatures presented at each side. Like any RC "circuit" there will be transient and steady-state conditions. Argue from there.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jimmy87
I don't think I quite follow. Do you mean the side of the beaker next to the surroundings had a different temperature to the inside part which is in contact with the liquid nitrogen?
 
Jimmy87 said:
I don't think I quite follow. Do you mean the side of the beaker next to the surroundings had a different temperature to the inside part which is in contact with the liquid nitrogen?
Yes. The inside wall will be held at the liquid nitrogen temperature (or very close to it depending upon the coefficient of heat transfer for the materials) while the outside wall is bathed in the outside air at (presumably) room temperature.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K