How Does the Ricci Tensor Affect Tensor Equations in Wald's Problem?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter tommyj
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges participants face in solving problem 10.2 from Wald's text, particularly focusing on the role of the Ricci tensor in tensor equations. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and technical explanations related to the application of tensor calculus in the context of general relativity.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express uncertainty about their previous solutions to part (b) of problem 10.2, indicating they found mistakes and are seeking clarification.
  • One participant mentions difficulties in eliminating terms in part (a) and questions how others approached the problem.
  • Another participant discusses the implications of constraints leading to the equation F^{ab}\nabla_an_b=0, expressing frustration that this does not assist in solving for the time derivative of initial conditions.
  • There is a mention of Gauss's law for electricity and magnetism, with participants attempting to show its validity on the space-like Cauchy surface, but they note complications arising from the Ricci tensor.
  • One participant acknowledges the challenge of writing tensor equations and appreciates the effort involved in sharing their work.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express individual challenges and uncertainties regarding their solutions, with no consensus on the correct approach or resolution of the problems presented. Multiple competing views and methods are discussed without agreement on a definitive solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity introduced by the Ricci tensor in their calculations, indicating that certain assumptions or definitions may not be fully resolved. There are also references to specific mathematical steps that remain unclear or unresolved.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in tensor calculus, general relativity, or those working on similar problems in advanced physics coursework may find the discussion relevant.

tommyj
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
EDIT dw i figured it out, not sure how to remove it though!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Could you show me how you did part (b) of problem 10.2?

Some while back I did problem 10.2 and I thought I did part (b) of it right (https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=687641#post4359286) but a few weeks later I found a mistake in my solution. Since then I forgot about the problem but you bringing it up has reminded me I have yet to still fix the mistake in my solution to part (b)!
 
Sorry to get your hopes up but I made mistakes in both parts! How did you do part a) may i ask? I can't get terms to disappear.

Also, for part b) both constraints only seem to imply that [itex]F^{ab}\nabla _an_b=0[/itex] which don't really seem to help to solve for the time derivative of the initial conditions. I've spent ages looking and can't find anything on it!
 
tommyj said:
Sorry to get your hopes up but I made mistakes in both parts! How did you do part a) may i ask? I can't get terms to disappear.

Let me start by showing that Gauss's law for electricity holds on the space-like Cauchy surface. Keep in mind that ##n^{a}n_{a} = -1##, which implies that ##n^{a}\nabla_{b}n_{a} = 0##; also keep in mind that ##n_{[a}\nabla_{b}n_{c]} = 0## since the unit normal field is hypersurface orthogonal to the space-like foliation ##\Sigma_t## (c.f. Theorem 8.3.14).

I will denote the derivative operator associated with the spatial metric ##h_{ab}## by ##\tilde{\nabla}_{a}##.

We have ##\tilde{\nabla}_{a}E^{a} = h_{a}{}{}^{b}h^{a}{}{}_{c}\nabla_{b}(F^{c}{}{}_{d}n^{d})\\ = (\delta^{bc} + n^{b}n^{c})(n^{d}\nabla_{b}F_{cd} + F_{cd}\nabla_{b}n^{d})\\ = n^{d}\nabla^{c}F_{cd} + F_{cd}\nabla^{c}n^{d} + n^{b}n^{c}n^{d}\nabla_{b}F_{cd} + n^{b}n^{c}F_{cd}\nabla_{b}n^{d}##.

Now ##n^{c}n^{d}\nabla_{b}F_{cd} = n^{d}n^{c}\nabla_{b}F_{dc} = -n^{c}n^{d}\nabla_{b}F_{cd}\Rightarrow n^{c}n^{d}\nabla_{b}F_{cd} = 0##

and ##n_{[a}\nabla_{b}n_{c]} = 0\Rightarrow n^{b}n^{c}F_{cd}\nabla_{b}n^{d} - n^{b}n^{d}F_{cd}\nabla_{b}n^{c}= 2n^{b}n^{c}F_{cd}\nabla_{b}n^{d}\\ = F_{cd}\nabla^{d}n^{c} - F_{cd}\nabla^{c}n^{d} = - 2F_{cd}\nabla^{c}n^{d}##

thus ##\tilde{\nabla}_{a}E^{a}= n^{d}\nabla^{c}F_{cd} = -4\pi j_{d}n^{d} = 4\pi\rho## by virtue of the inhomogeneous Maxwell equations.

Showing Gauss's law for magnetism holds on the spacelike Cauchy surface is very similar.

We have ##\tilde{\nabla}_{a}B^{a} =-\frac{1}{2}\epsilon^{cdef} h_{a}{}{}^{b}h^{a}{}{}_{c}\nabla_{b}(F_{de}n_{f})\\ = -\frac{1}{2}\epsilon^{cdef} (n_{f}\nabla_{c}F_{de} + F_{de}\nabla_{c}n_{f} + n^{b}n_{c}n_{f}\nabla_{b}F_{de} + n^{b}n_{c}F_{de}\nabla_{b}n_{f})##.

Now ##\epsilon^{cdef}n_{c}n_{f} = 0## because the volume form is totally antisymmetric and just as before we have ##n_{[a}\nabla_{b}n_{c]} = 0 \Rightarrow \epsilon^{cdef} n^{b}n_{c}F_{de}\nabla_{b}n_{f} - \epsilon^{cdef} n^{b}n_{f}F_{de}\nabla_{b}n_{c}= 2\epsilon^{cdef} n^{b}n_{c}F_{de}\nabla_{b}n_{f}\\ = \epsilon^{cdef} F_{de}\nabla_{f}n_{c} - \epsilon^{cdef}F_{de}\nabla_{c}n_{f} = -2 \epsilon^{cdef}F_{de}\nabla_{c}n_{f}##

so we are left with ##\tilde{\nabla}_{a}B^{a} = -\frac{1}{2}\epsilon^{cdef} n_{f}\nabla_{c}F_{de}##. But ##\epsilon^{cdef}\nabla_{c}F_{de} = -\epsilon^{cdef}\nabla_{d}F_{ce} = \epsilon^{cdef}\nabla_{e}F_{cd}## hence ##3\epsilon^{cdef}\nabla_{c}F_{de} = 3\epsilon^{cdef}\nabla_{[c}F_{de]} = 0 ## by virtue of the homogeneous Maxwell equations thus we have the desired result ##\tilde{\nabla}_{a}B^{a} = 0##.

tommyj said:
Also, for part b) both constraints only seem to imply that [itex]F^{ab}\nabla _an_b=0[/itex] which don't really seem to help to solve for the time derivative of the initial conditions. I've spent ages looking and can't find anything on it!

I'm stuck on that calculation as well. I have to finish my particle physics HW but after that I'll take another jab at it.
 
ah man I even noted the hypersurface orthogonal relation as I knew it would be useful but I forgot about it. You live and learn as they say. thanks a lot, I know how much effort it is to write tensor equations on here so I really appreciate it!

I cannot see how to do the second part. Its completely different from the example in the book, the Ricci Tensor term just messes everything up for the second constraint part
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
925
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K