MHB How Does the Triangle Inequality Apply to Complex Numbers?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the inequality 2|z||w| ≤ |z|^2 + |w|^2 for complex numbers z and w. Participants suggest using the non-negativity of (|z| - |w|)^2 to derive the result, expanding it to show that |z|^2 + |w|^2 - 2Re(zw*) is non-negative. An alternative approach involves expressing |z|^2 + |w|^2 in terms of their real and imaginary components, leading to the application of the arithmetic-geometric mean inequality. The conversation also touches on the derivation of the expression for (|z| - |w|)^2 and its relation to the real part of the product of z and the conjugate of w. The thread effectively explores different methods to establish the triangle inequality in the context of complex numbers.
Poirot1
Messages
243
Reaction score
0
let z,w be complex numbers. Prove:

2|z||w| <_ |z|^2 + |w|^2
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well, you could note that $(|z| - |w|)^2 \geq 0$ and work from there.
 
0<_ (|z|-|w|)^2=|z|^2+|w|^2-2Re(zw*).

Ok so I can say Re(zw*)<_|zw*|=|zw| but that doesn't quite get me there.
 
They are both real numbers, so when you expand $(|z| - |w|)^2$ you get $|z|^2 - 2|z| |w| + |w|^2 \geq 0$, hence the result.

There is the alternative of using that

$$|z|^2 + |w|^2 = \Re^2 (z) + \Im^2 (z) + \Re^2 (w) + \Im^2(w)$$

and

$$2|z||w| = 2 \sqrt{\Re^2 (z) + \Im^2 (z) } \sqrt{\Re^2 (w) + \Im^2 (w)} = 2 \sqrt{(\Re^2 (z) + \Im^2 (z))(\Re^2 (w) + \Im^2 (w))}.$$

Now, $a = \Re^2 (z) + \Im^2 (z)$ is a positive real number, same as $b = \Re^2 (w) + \Im^2 (w)$. This is the arithmetic geometric mean written in a different way:

$$\frac{a+b}{2} \geq \sqrt{ab} \implies \frac{\Re^2 (z) + \Im^2 (z) + \Re^2 (w) + \Im^2(w)}{2} \geq \sqrt{(\Re^2 (z) + \Im^2 (z))(\Re^2 (w) + \Im^2 (w))}.$$

How did you get that $(|z| - |w|)^2 = |z|^2 + |w|^2 - 2 \Re (z \bar{w})$?
 
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K