MHB How Does the Triangle Inequality Apply to Complex Numbers?

Poirot1
Messages
243
Reaction score
0
let z,w be complex numbers. Prove:

2|z||w| <_ |z|^2 + |w|^2
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well, you could note that $(|z| - |w|)^2 \geq 0$ and work from there.
 
0<_ (|z|-|w|)^2=|z|^2+|w|^2-2Re(zw*).

Ok so I can say Re(zw*)<_|zw*|=|zw| but that doesn't quite get me there.
 
They are both real numbers, so when you expand $(|z| - |w|)^2$ you get $|z|^2 - 2|z| |w| + |w|^2 \geq 0$, hence the result.

There is the alternative of using that

$$|z|^2 + |w|^2 = \Re^2 (z) + \Im^2 (z) + \Re^2 (w) + \Im^2(w)$$

and

$$2|z||w| = 2 \sqrt{\Re^2 (z) + \Im^2 (z) } \sqrt{\Re^2 (w) + \Im^2 (w)} = 2 \sqrt{(\Re^2 (z) + \Im^2 (z))(\Re^2 (w) + \Im^2 (w))}.$$

Now, $a = \Re^2 (z) + \Im^2 (z)$ is a positive real number, same as $b = \Re^2 (w) + \Im^2 (w)$. This is the arithmetic geometric mean written in a different way:

$$\frac{a+b}{2} \geq \sqrt{ab} \implies \frac{\Re^2 (z) + \Im^2 (z) + \Re^2 (w) + \Im^2(w)}{2} \geq \sqrt{(\Re^2 (z) + \Im^2 (z))(\Re^2 (w) + \Im^2 (w))}.$$

How did you get that $(|z| - |w|)^2 = |z|^2 + |w|^2 - 2 \Re (z \bar{w})$?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top