How does thermal stress affect the length of a constrained rod?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Physicsnb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Temperature change
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of thermal stress on a constrained rod, particularly focusing on how temperature changes influence the rod's length when it is fixed at both ends. Participants explore the concepts of thermal strain and the equations that describe these phenomena.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the derivation of thermal strain and question the use of original versus new length in the equations. There are attempts to clarify the relationship between temperature change and length change, as well as the implications of constraints on the rod's expansion.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided insights into the derivation of thermal strain and the assumptions involved. There is ongoing clarification regarding the definitions of terms like initial length and freely expanded length, with some participants suggesting that the derivation could be approached differently. The discussion remains open with various interpretations being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the framework of linearized strain theory and are considering the implications of small temperature changes on the rod's behavior. There is an acknowledgment of the constraints imposed by the fixed ends of the rod, which influences the discussion on thermal strain.

Physicsnb
Messages
21
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
In a lecture of thermal stress my professor defined thermal strain as ' L α ΔT/ L = α ΔT ' [since strain= ΔL/L and ΔL after application of heat is L α ΔT].
He said that on a constrained body that's not allowed to expand , a force is applied on the body .
If the constraints were removed then the new length would be equal to ' L+ L α ΔT '
However while deriving the formula for thermal strain he used the length 'L' as original length .
My question is : "Shouldn't L(new) be used to derive the equation instead of length L , since the rod is compressed from this length by the walls/constraints not length L. "
Relevant Equations
ΔL= L α ΔT
ΔL = Change in length of the body
L= Original Length of the body
α= Thermal Coefficient og linear expansion
ΔT=Change in temperature
New length after change in temp, L(new) = L+L α ΔT
My attempt at deriving the equation:
Let a temperature a rod of length L constrained by walls on both ends be changed by ΔT.
So the change in lenghth of rod under no constraints = L α ΔT
Length of rod after change in temperature without walls =L+L α ΔT= L(1+L α ΔT)
However with constraints the rod is forced to length L
Then,

Thermal strain = ΔL/L(1+L α ΔT)
Thermal strain= L α ΔT/L(1+L α ΔT) = α ΔT/(1+L α ΔT)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Physicsnb said:
Homework Statement: In a lecture of thermal stress my professor defined thermal strain as ' L α ΔT/ L = α ΔT ' [since strain= ΔL/L and ΔL after application of heat is L α ΔT].
He said that on a constrained body that's not allowed to expand , a force is applied on the body .
If the constraints were removed then the new length would be equal to ' L+ L α ΔT '
However while deriving the formula for thermal strain he used the length 'L' as original length .
My question is : "Shouldn't L(new) be used to derive the equation instead of length L , since the rod is compressed from this length by the walls/constraints not length L. "
Relevant Equations: ΔL= L α ΔT
ΔL = Change in length of the body
L= Original Length of the body
α= Thermal Coefficient og linear expansion
ΔT=Change in temperature
New length after change in temp, L(new) = L+L α ΔT

My attempt at deriving the equation:
Let a temperature a rod of length L constrained by walls on both ends be changed by ΔT.
So the change in lenghth of rod under no constraints = L α ΔT
Length of rod after change in temperature without walls =L+L α ΔT= L(1+L α ΔT)
However with constraints the rod is forced to length L
Then,

Thermal strain = ΔL/L(1+L α ΔT)
Thermal strain= L α ΔT/L(1+L α ΔT) = α ΔT/(1+L α ΔT)


It's a first order approximation to the differential equation (1) about ## L = L_o##:

$$ \frac{dL}{dT} = \alpha L \tag{1}$$

So we say that since ##L \gg \Delta L ##

$$ L \approx L_o + \left. \frac{dL}{dT}\right|_{L_o} \Delta T $$

$$ L \approx L_o + \alpha L_o \Delta T = L_o \left( 1 + \alpha \Delta T \right) $$
 
Last edited:
Physicsnb said:
So the change in lenghth of rod under no constraints = L α ΔT
Length of rod after change in temperature without walls =L+L α ΔT= L(1+L α ΔT)


At the far right of the second line above, the ##L## inside the parentheses should not be there.

Physicsnb said:
However with constraints the rod is forced to length L
Then,

Thermal strain = ΔL/L(1+L α ΔT)
Thermal strain= L α ΔT/L(1+L α ΔT) = α ΔT/(1+L α ΔT)


OK, except for the ##L## inside the parentheses. So, your derivation gives for the thermal strain $$\text{Thermal strain} = \alpha \Delta T/(1+\alpha \Delta T)$$
Generally, ##\alpha \Delta T## is small compared to 1. In that case, the ##\alpha \Delta T## can be neglected in the denominator. So, to a good approximation $$\text{Thermal strain} = \alpha \Delta T$$ which is the same as what your professor gets. But, I think it's good to think about it the way you did.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
erobz said:
It's a first order approximation to the differential equation (1) about ## L = L_o##:

$$ \frac{dL}{dT} = \alpha L \tag{1}$$

So we say that since ##L \gg \Delta L ##

$$ L \approx L_o + \left. \frac{dL}{dT}\right|_{L_o} \Delta T $$

$$ L \approx L_o + \alpha L_o \Delta T = L_o \left( 1 + \alpha \Delta T \right) $$
Whats L_o? Also , my question was that why is strain =α Δ T .
Also can you please elaborate your derivation a bit more (specifically the second step)
 
TSny said:
At the far right of the second line above, the ##L## inside the parentheses should not be there.OK, except for the ##L## inside the parentheses. So, your derivation gives for the thermal strain $$\text{Thermal strain} = \alpha \Delta T/(1+\alpha \Delta T)$$
Generally, ##\alpha \Delta T## is small compared to 1. In that case, the ##\alpha \Delta T## can be neglected in the denominator. So, to a good approximation $$\text{Thermal strain} = \alpha \Delta T$$ which is the same as what your professor gets. But, I think it's good to think about it the way you did.
Thanks for your explanation .
 
Physicsnb said:
Whats L_o? Also , my question was that why is strain =
α

Δ T .

##L_o## is the initial length of the body.

The strain is ## \epsilon = \frac{ \Delta L}{ L_o}##

$$ \epsilon = \frac{L - L_o}{L_o} = \frac{L_o( 1 + \alpha \Delta T ) - L_o}{ L_o} = \alpha \Delta T $$
 
erobz said:
##L_o## is the initial length of the body.

The strain is ## \epsilon = \frac{ \Delta L}{ L_o}##

$$ \epsilon = \frac{L - L_o}{L_o} = \frac{L_o( 1 + \alpha \Delta T ) - L_o}{ L_o} = \alpha \Delta T $$
So ,
What's L here? New length?
 
Physicsnb said:
So ,
What's L here? New length?
It's the length of the freely expanded body when thermal equilibrium has been reached.
 
erobz said:
##L_o## is the initial length of the body.

The strain is ## \epsilon = \frac{ \Delta L}{ L_o}
erobz said:
It's a first order approximation to the differential equation (1) about ## L = L_o##:

$$ \frac{dL}{dT} = \alpha L \tag{1}$$

So we say that since ##L \gg \Delta L ##

$$ L \approx L_o + \left. \frac{dL}{dT}\right|_{L_o} \Delta T $$

$$ L \approx L_o + \alpha L_o \Delta T = L_o \left( 1 + \alpha \Delta T \right) $$
Could you please elaborate how you got to second step?

erobz said:
##

erobz said:
It's a first order approximation to the differential equation (1) about ## L = L_o##:

$$ \frac{dL}{dT} = \alpha L \tag{1}$$

So we say that since ##L \gg \Delta L ##

$$ L \approx L_o + \left. \frac{dL}{dT}\right|_{L_o} \Delta T $$

$$ L \approx L_o + \alpha L_o \Delta T = L_o \left( 1 + \alpha \Delta T \right) $$
Could you please explain how you got to the send equation?
 
  • #10
Physicsnb said:
Could you please explain how you got to the send equation?
It's a first order Taylor Expansion about the fixed length ##L_o##. A Taylor Expansion is an approximation of a function about a given point over some interval.

That second step is the length function (which would be found by integrating (1) ) truncated to the linear terms of the expansion.

So the first term is what we expect with no change in temp. Its just ##L_o##. Then we extend it by saying over some change in temp## \Delta T##, that ##L## approximately changes like the ## \frac{dL}{dT}|_{L_o} \Delta T = \alpha L_o \Delta T ##
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Physicsnb
  • #11
You are working with small (linearized) strain theory. At this level of approximation, ##\alpha \Delta T## is negligible compared to unity. So the thermal strain is ##\alpha \Delta T## and the superimposed compressive strain is ##\sigma /E##, where E is Young's modulus and ##\sigma## is the compressive stress..
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Physicsnb

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
5K