How Does Wireless Power Transmission Work?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Wireless power transmission operates by utilizing alternating current through one coil, which couples with another coil, as explained by WiTricity. This method is akin to mechanical resonance, enhancing efficiency over longer distances compared to traditional induction. However, skepticism surrounds the technology's practicality and efficiency, with claims of fantastic performance often lacking empirical support. The discussion highlights the challenges of implementing this technology widely, including concerns about efficiency, distance limitations, and potential safety issues associated with microwave transmission.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wireless power transmission principles
  • Familiarity with mechanical resonance concepts
  • Knowledge of electromagnetic fields and their behavior
  • Awareness of current technologies like WiTricity and NASA's SERT program
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the efficiency metrics of WiTricity's wireless power transmission technology
  • Explore the principles of mechanical resonance in electrical engineering
  • Investigate the historical context and advancements in microwave power transmission
  • Examine safety regulations and public perception regarding wireless power systems
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, researchers, and technology enthusiasts interested in the development and challenges of wireless power transmission systems, as well as those exploring alternatives to traditional energy distribution methods.

  • #31
There's no inverse square law problem with directed or focused EM waves energy beams. Problems are of other kinds.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
zoki85 said:
Problems are of other kinds.
Would you include the size and aiming of the antennas as a problem?
 
  • #33
Baluncore said:
Would you include the size and aiming of the antennas as a problem?
Yes. Preceise beam pointing to the rectantenna site on the ground is of crucial importance in such transmission. Needless to say, it requires special technology and methods.
 
  • #34
zoki85 said:
There's no inverse square law problem with directed or focused EM waves energy beams. Problems are of other kinds.
You cannot beat the inverse square law, once the distance is great enough. Spreading loss is always with us and using directive antennae only increases the gain in a particular direction.
The fancy stuff with metamaterials presupposed you can stick the (equivalent of a) lens between transmitter and receiver and that presupposes that you have somewhere to mount it.
"Special technology and methods" smacks a bit too much of Magic, rather than Engineering.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Baluncore
  • #35
zoki85 said:
Yes. Preceise beam pointing to the rectantenna site on the ground is of crucial importance in such transmission. Needless to say, it requires special technology and methods.

I understand the incredible technical challenge of efficient microwave energy transfer from space to Earth because I have done my time in antenna design and in the tracking systems of big dish antennas for radio astronomy.

The size and surface phase accuracy of the antennas required for efficient energy transfer from space to Earth is fundamental to countering the inverse square law. Space power will be uneconomic on Earth unless we can find a practical parallel ray energy transfer mechanism.
 
  • #36
sophiecentaur said:
Spreading loss is always with us and using directive antennae only increases the gain in a particular direction.
Point is that distance is close enough so that spreading loss can be made small enough.
The fancy stuff with metamaterials presupposed you can stick the (equivalent of a) lens between transmitter and receiver and that presupposes that you have somewhere to mount it.
I am not familar with proposed use of metamaterials included anywhere in space between satellites and ground receiver.
Would you give us references?
"Special technology and methods" smacks a bit too much of Magic, rather than Engineering.
There are lot of papers published in per review journals about these technologies and their state of art. It's not magic, it can be done. Much bigger problems are very high price for installation, and question if the expense can be justifyed or not (personally, I don't so). OTOH, there are other very costly power energetic programs like ITER , which are much more important.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
11K
Replies
20
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K