How Does x^{p^n}-x Relate to Monic Irreducible Polynomials in \mathbb{Z}_p[x]?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the polynomial x^{p^n}-x and monic irreducible polynomials in the polynomial ring \mathbb{Z}_p[x]. Participants are exploring the implications of the roots of x^{p^n}-x and their connection to irreducible polynomials of specific degrees.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to establish that the zeros of monic irreducible polynomials are also zeros of x^{p^n}-x and questioning whether the irreducible polynomial associated with a zero must be a factor of x^{p^n}-x. There is discussion about the minimal polynomial and its properties, including its relationship to other polynomials in \mathbb{Z}_p[x].

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the properties of minimal polynomials and their implications for the factorization of x^{p^n}-x. Some participants are exploring the degrees of these polynomials in relation to the structure of fields and extensions.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the degrees of polynomials and the relationship between the roots of x^{p^n}-x and the structure of finite fields, particularly regarding divisibility and the implications for irreducible polynomials. Participants are also considering the implications of adjoining roots to \mathbb{Z}_p.

ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Show that x^{p^n}-x is the product of all the monic irreducible polynomials in \mathbb{Z}_p[x] of a degree d dividing n.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


So, I want to prove that the zeros of all such monic polynomials are also zeros of x^{p^n}-x and vice versa. I cannot do either, unfortunately. We know that the elements of GF(p^n) are precisely the zeros of x^{p^n}-x. And we know that if f(x) is a monic polynomial of degree m in \mathbb{Z}_p[x], then when you adjoin any of its zeros to \mathbb{Z}_p, you get a field with p^m elements whose elements are precisely the zeros of x^{p^m}-x. So, I guess if \alpha is a zero of x^{p^n}-x, then does the irreducible monic polynomial that \alpha is a zero of need to be a factor of x^{p^n}-x?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ehrenfest said:
So, I guess if \alpha is a zero of x^{p^n}-x, then does the irreducible monic polynomial that it is a zero of need to be a factor of x^{p^n}-x?
Yes: if m(x) is the minimal polynomial of \alpha over Z_p (what you call the irreducible monic polynomial associated with \alpha), and if f(x) is a another polynomial in Z_p[x] with \alpha as a root, then m(x)|f(x).
 
morphism said:
Yes: if m(x) is the minimal polynomial of \alpha over Z_p (what you call the irreducible monic polynomial associated with \alpha), and if f(x) is a another polynomial in Z_p[x] with \alpha as a root, then m(x)|f(x).

If you write out the unique factorization of m(x) and f(x) in \bar{\mathbb{Z}_p}[x], then both factorizations must contain x-\alpha, but why does m(x) need to contain factors with all of the other zeros of f(x)? Does it have something to with the fact that <m(x)> is a maximal ideal in \mathbb{Z}_p[x]?
 
m(x) is the monic polynomial of least degree with \alpha as a root (prove this if you don't already know it). Because Z_p is a field, Z_p[x] has a division algorithm. So let's write f(x)=a(x)m(x)+r(x), where r is either zero or its degree is less than that of m. Now note that f(\alpha)=a(\alpha)m(\alpha)+r(\alpha), which implies that r(\alpha)=0. The minimality of m now let's us conclude that r=0.
 
So the next step is to show that if \alpha is a zero of x^{p^n}-x, then the minimal polynomial of \alpha has degree d dividing n. That would imply that the factorization of x^{p^n}-x over \mathbb{Z}_p consists only of polynomials of degree d dividing n. Let m be the degree of \alpha. Then \alpha is also a solution to x^{p^m}-x but I am not really sure if that even helps.
 
anyone?
 
If you adjoin \alpha to Z_p, you'll get a subfield of GF(p^n). But now d=[Z_p(alpha) : Z_p] is a divisor of n=[GF(p^n) : Z_p].

(If the minimal polynomial of \alpha over F has degree d, then alpha generates an extension of degree d of F.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
48
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K