How Far Should an Air Tanker Release Its Load to Hit a Target?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kle89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Airplane
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the appropriate horizontal distance for an air tanker to release its load of flame retardant chemicals in order to hit a target located directly below it. The scenario is set at an altitude of 180 m with the tanker flying at a speed of 80 m/s, and air resistance is neglected.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to use projectile motion equations to relate horizontal and vertical distances but faces confusion regarding the correct application of these equations. Some participants question the validity of equating horizontal and vertical displacements, suggesting a need to first determine the time taken for the chemicals to reach the ground.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging in clarifying the problem setup and the equations involved. There is a recognition of the need to calculate the time of fall separately from the horizontal motion, leading to a proposed method for finding the drop distance based on the time it takes for the chemicals to reach the ground.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the importance of understanding the relationship between the time of descent and the horizontal distance traveled, indicating that the original poster may have overcomplicated their initial approach.

kle89
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Problem
An air tanker flies horizontally at an altitude of 180 m and a speed of 80 m/s over a forest fire. In
order to hit its target with flame retardant chemicals, how far before it is directly over the target should it
release its load? Neglect air resistance.

Using Projectile motion equations
for the horizontal distance, I set it = to x = (80m/s)(t)
for the vertical distance i used y = y' + vy't - 1/2gt^2 getting y = 180 - (.5)(10 m/s^2)(t^2)

I set them equal to each other

(80m/s)(t) = 180 - (.5)(10 m/s^s)(t^s)
solved for t and got 2 seconds.

Am i doing things right so far or did i mess up somewhere? Thanks in advance?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, why did you equate x displacement and y displacements ?
What is required is that by the time the chemicals reach the ground, they must have moved horizontally to the exact point of the fire. Find the time taken for the chemicals to reach the ground. Then you can find the tihe distance it travels in that time and thus get the drop distance. Do you follow ?
 
"y = 180 - (.5)(10 m/s^2)(t^2)"

This makes no sense the way it is. You know the total distance it falls, what are you trying to solve for here? (y is zero, since it is at ground level).

"(80m/s)(t) = 180 - (.5)(10 m/s^s)(t^s)"

This doesn't make sense either. You can't equate y to x to solve for t, which is what it looks like you're trying to do. They are not representing the same distance.

What you need to consider is how long it will take the chemicals to fall from the height of 180 m. Once you have that you can figure out what x should be.
 
Thanks for the input.

I used y = y' + vy't - 1/2gt^2
0 = 180m + 0 - 1/2(9.8m/s^2)t^2
4.9t^2 = 180m
t = 6s

So i would plug this into the horizontal velocity x = 80m/s(6s) = 480m

Thanks, is this correct? perhaps i was thinking way to hard earlier.
 
kle89 said:
Thanks for the input.

I used y = y' + vy't - 1/2gt^2
0 = 180m + 0 - 1/2(9.8m/s^2)t^2
4.9t^2 = 180m
t = 6s

So i would plug this into the horizontal velocity x = 80m/s(6s) = 480m

Thanks, is this correct? perhaps i was thinking way to hard earlier.

That looks good to me.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K