- 42,792
- 10,490
Quite possibly.akshajkadaveru said:HOLY MOLY...in all honesty.. am i over complicating this ?
The discussion revolves around solving a projectile motion problem involving an initial velocity of 4 m/s at a 60-degree angle, targeting a distance of 1.0 m horizontally. Key calculations include determining the y-coordinate of the target, which was found to be approximately 3.2 meters, and the time to hit the target, which was debated between 0.25 seconds and 0.5 seconds. The final vertical velocity was calculated to be -1.44 m/s, and the overall speed before impact was derived using the Pythagorean theorem, resulting in a magnitude of 3.99 m/s at an angle of 59.97 degrees. The discussion highlights common misconceptions and emphasizes the importance of using correct initial conditions and equations in projectile motion.
PREREQUISITESStudents studying physics, particularly those focusing on kinematics and projectile motion, as well as educators looking for examples of common student misconceptions in these topics.
Quite possibly.akshajkadaveru said:HOLY MOLY...in all honesty.. am i over complicating this ?
Plot them if you wish, but to answer the question you should use algebra and calculation.akshajkadaveru said:so for D... i already have the x y values and the angle right? so now i just have to plot them or something >
Yes.akshajkadaveru said:overall speed... is that by the pythagorean theorem
You've used the initial vertical velocity. As a result, you've recalculated the initial angle and overall speed.akshajkadaveru said:2^2+3.46^2=15.97
sqrt(15.97)
3.99 m/s
tan^-1(3.46/2)= 59.97 degrees
3.99m/s @ 59.97 degrees'
You posted the correct final vertical velocity in post #27. Just use that instead of 3.46 in your calculation in post #36.akshajkadaveru said:ARGHGHGHH! so what i JUST did was wrong but what will my X and Y value things be then ?
I meant 28.akshajkadaveru said:i didn't post anything on 27
Where are you getting 1m/s from for the x direction?akshajkadaveru said:so is it... 1^2+1.44^2=whatever
sqrt(whatever)= ______ @ tan^-1(1.44/1)?
will that be my answer?
No, you can't add a velocity to a length, or a velocity-squared to a length-squared. It makes no sense.akshajkadaveru said:oh... i thought that't just the length of how far the thing went... how do i get that then >?