How Far Will the Cord Stretch When a 2kg Block is Suspended?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a 2kg block suspended from a cord with a spring constant of 100 N/m. The original poster seeks to determine the maximum length of the cord when it is stretched after the block is released from rest. The initial length of the cord is 0.5m.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to analyze the problem using kinetic energy and potential energy concepts, focusing on the energy transformations as the block falls and the cord stretches.
  • Some participants question the appropriateness of using forces in an energy conservation context and discuss the implications of mixing different approaches.
  • Others suggest a clearer separation of energy conservation principles and the use of forces, indicating that both methods can yield correct results but caution against combining them.

Discussion Status

The discussion is exploring different methods to approach the problem, with some participants providing guidance on energy conservation principles. There is an ongoing examination of the reasoning behind using forces versus energy conservation, but no consensus has been reached on the best approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of energy conservation and force analysis, with some expressing confusion about the correct application of these concepts in the context of the problem.

Ry122
Messages
563
Reaction score
2
a cord with a spring constant of 100N/m has a 2.0kg block suspended from it.
the length of the cord when it is unstretched is .5m.
the block is released. determine the length of the cord when it is at the maximum length of elongation.

my attempt:
first determine the kinetic energy of the block just before the block reaches the point where
the cord begins to elongate beyond the length of .5m
it is after this point that kinetic energy then begins to be converted into potential spring energy in the cord.
it is this energy combined with the weight of the block that are going to determine the maximum length of elongation of the cord. this is because when all of the kinetic energy of the block is turned into potential spring energy the only remaining force that would cause the cord to further elongate would be the weight of the block pulling down on the cord.
First, to determine the extension of the spring due to the weight of the block
use f=kx
9.8 x 2 = 100x
x=0.196
then to determine the energy that this causes to be stored in the cord use
E=1/2kx^2
1/2(100)(.196)^2=.98 J
this energy combined with the energy that the kinetic energy provides should determine the total length of elongation of the cord
.98 + (2 x 9.8 x .5) = 1/2(100)x^2
x=.464327m
can someone tell me where I am going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't use forces in an energy conservation set up. Start with initial energy and then do the final energy where the mass is stretched to its farthest...

KE = kinetic energy
GPE = gravitation potential energy
SPE = spring potential energy

Initial Energy: KE = 0 (because it starts from rest), GPE = mgh (starts from height 'h'), and SPE = 0 (spring is starting at equilibrium)

Final Energy: KE = 0 (reached max distance so speed is 0), GPE = 0 (fell as far as it will go), SPE = (1/2)*k*h^2 (now it is a distance 'h' from the equilibrium point)

You equate the energies due to energy conservation and solve for the longest displacement from equilibrium. Then you need to remember that the question is asking for the full length of the string when it is stretched this much.
 
what's wrong with using forces in an energy conservation set up? why doesn't doing it that way yield the correct answer?
 
You can use forces to solve for it or use conservation of energy. Both will get you the right answer. But there is no use mixing them together. One deals with vectors and the other uses scalars. You would just be doing more work than necessary.
 

Similar threads

Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K