How Fast Can Neutron Stars Spin Before Losing Surface Material?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the dynamics of neutron stars, specifically focusing on the maximum angular speed they can achieve before losing surface material. The problem involves concepts of gravitational force, centripetal acceleration, and escape velocity in the context of astrophysics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between gravitational force and centripetal acceleration, questioning the assumptions around escape velocity and weightlessness at the equator of the neutron star. Some suggest using force balance to analyze the problem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active with participants offering different perspectives on how to approach the problem. Some guidance has been provided regarding the use of gravitational and centrifugal forces, but there is no explicit consensus on the best method to solve the problem.

Contextual Notes

There appears to be some confusion among participants regarding the interpretation of the problem and the methods to be used, particularly concerning the relevance of escape velocity in this context.

kim3648
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Neutron stars are extremely dense objects that are formed from the remnants of supernova explosions. Many rotate very rapidly. Suppose that the mass of a certain spherical neutron star is twice the mass of the Sun and its radius is 5.0 km. Determine the greatest possible angular speed it can have so that the matter at the surface of the star on its equator is just held in orbit by the gravitational force.

First I would find escape velocity
https://www.physicsforums.com/latex_images/11/112728-0.png
And using that velocity as the tangent I could find the angular velocity? Is that a correct assumption?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm, this problem is a little tricky in disguise. If matter at the equator is JUST held on my gravity, that means the object is ALMOST weightless. Use a force balance and set that equal to m*centripedal acceleration and then ask yourself what it means to be weightless. Where does that get you?
 
I think you have my question confused with that of the person below me !
 
That's interesting. I think you have your question confused with another one! No, but really...you can do your problem either way. It's just easier the way I said in my opinion.
 
kim3648 said:
First I would find escape velocity
https://www.physicsforums.com/latex_images/11/112728-0.png
And using that velocity as the tangent I could find the angular velocity? Is that a correct assumption?

It's not necessary here to find escape velo. The force due to gravity should be equal to the centrifugal force at the equator. The same as dwintz02 said.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
dwintz02 said:
That's interesting. I think you have your question confused with another one! No, but really...you can do your problem either way. It's just easier the way I said in my opinion.

He can't do it using escape velocity.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
9K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K