How fast is the center of mass of a tissue paper roll when its radius is 0.14cm?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Houyhnhnm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Paper Roll
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The speed of the center of mass of a cylindrical roll of tissue paper with an initial radius of 6.1 cm, when its radius diminishes to 0.14 cm, can be calculated using principles of conservation of energy and rotational dynamics. The relevant equations include the moment of inertia for a cylinder, given by I = (1/2)MR², and the kinetic energy equations for both translational and rotational motion. The derived formula for the velocity of the center of gravity is v = √(g(R³ - r³)/(r² + 2R²)), leading to an approximate speed of 2 m/s for the center of gravity of the entire roll.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservation of energy principles
  • Familiarity with rotational dynamics and moment of inertia
  • Knowledge of angular velocity and its relationship to linear velocity
  • Basic proficiency in algebra and physics problem-solving
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the moment of inertia for various shapes, focusing on cylinders
  • Learn about the conservation of energy in rotational systems
  • Explore the relationship between linear and angular velocity in detail
  • Practice solving problems involving rolling motion and energy conservation
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of rolling objects and energy conservation in mechanical systems.

Houyhnhnm
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
OK here's a question which I really, really can't understand.

A large, cylindrical roll of tissue paper of initial radius R lies on a long, horizontal surface with the outside end of the paper nailed to the surface. The roll is given a slight shove (initial velocity is about zero) and commences to unroll. Determine the speed of the center of mass when its radius has diminished to r = .14cm assuming R is 6.1cm.

Somebody told me to use angular momentum, but how can I when the initial velocity is zero? I'm quite confused. Also, they give that g = 9.80 m/s^2, why would we need that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know about conservation of energy?
 
Originally posted by NateTG
Do you know about conservation of energy?

Is there such thing as rotational potential energy?
 
More info is needed. You can't solve this without at least knowing the initial velocity (after it's pushed).
 
Last edited:
Originally posted by ShawnD
More info is needed. You can't solve this without at least knowing the initial velocity (after it's pushed).

\lim_{\vec{v}_0 \rightarrow \vec{0}}\vec{v} exists, so you can just assume that the inital velocity is arbitrarily small.

Is there such thing as rotational potential energy?
No, there is however, rotational kinetic energy --
KE_{rot}=\frac{1}{2}I\omega^2

The moment of inertia of the cylinder is \frac{1}{2}MR^2


One of the problems is that the problem is unclear about which center of mass it wants to know about (whether to include the dropped paper or not).

Leaving the paper behind makes things significantly more complicated, so I'll use the other answer.

This leads to the following equation:
mhg=\frac{1}{2}I\omega^2+\frac{1}{2}mv^2
which has two unknowns, so we need a second equation which relates the velocity of the center of gravity to the angular speed.
If we assume that the toilet paper has negligible thickness, then we get:
\omega=\frac{v}{r}
Applying the formula for moment of inertia yieds
I=\frac{1}{2}mr^2=\frac{1}{2}M\frac{r^3}{R^2}
The change in height of the center of gravity:
h=R-\frac{r^3}{R^2}
If we plug things back in we get:
Mg(R-\frac{r^3}{R^2})=v^2(\frac{r^2}{4R^2}M+\frac{1}{2}M)
the M's cancel
g(\frac{R^3-r^3}{R^2})=v^2(\frac{r^2+2R^2}{4R^2})
The denominators cancel
\sqrt{\frac{g(R^3-r^3)}{r^2+2R^2}}=v
This is the velocity of the center of gravity. The velocity of the center of the cylinder is
\frac{R^2}{r^2}\sqrt{\frac{g(R^3-r^3)}{r^2+2R^2}}

I come up with roughly 40 m/s for the small cylinder, and roughly 2 m/s for the center of gravity of the whole roll. YMMV, and you should check to make sure what I did makes sense, and whether you can catch the math errors I snuck in.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K