Where is my mistake? (Pure rolling and center of mass)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a cylinder attached to a spring, rolling without slipping, and seeks to determine the frequency of its motion. The context includes concepts from dynamics and rotational motion, specifically focusing on pure rolling conditions and the relationship between linear and angular acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the forces acting on the cylinder, including spring force and friction, and question the signs used in the equations. There is an exploration of the relationship between linear acceleration and angular acceleration, particularly the validity of the equation a=αR.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively questioning the assumptions made in the original poster's equations and exploring the implications of pure rolling without friction. Some guidance has been offered regarding the direction of forces and the need for consistency in the signs of the equations. Multiple interpretations of the problem setup are being explored.

Contextual Notes

There are uncertainties regarding the attachment mechanism of the spring to the cylinder and how it maintains its position during motion. Participants also express confusion about the conditions under which pure rolling occurs without friction.

Eitan Levy
Messages
259
Reaction score
11

Homework Statement


A cylinder with a mass of M and radius R is attached to a spring with a constant of k. The attachment always stays the same as described in the picture. The cylinder is moved to the right and the released, and it rolls without slipping (pure rolling). What will be the frequency of its movement? ICM=0.5MR^2 and the center of mass is at the middle.
o16aB3h.png


Homework Equations


ma=F
Iα=Sum of torques.

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to the following.
first I think that the forces relevant are the forces applied by the spring and the friction from the floor. Then I wrote these equations:
MaCM=-kx+f where f is the friction.
ICMα=r1×F1+r2×F2=-0.5Rkx-Rf.

Then when I tried to say that a=αR (pure rolling) I get that f=0, which is not possible and gives a wrong answer.

Where is my mistake?

EDIT: From what I understand by reading the solution, the problem is that for some reason αR=a is incorrect but 1.5αR=a is correct. I have absolutely no idea why.
 

Attachments

  • o16aB3h.png
    o16aB3h.png
    5.9 KB · Views: 527
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

One cause is that f appears with a + sign in the first and with a - sign in the second equation. Subtract them and you get f = 0.

Now for the physics:
What is the axis of rotation ? Where is the spring attached to the cylinder ?
 
The next step with such questions, after drawing the FBD, is to be very clear about which directions of displacement, acceleration, force, and rotation are positive.
Looks like you have right as positive for linear motion. Which way are taking as positive for rotation? Is that consistent with your a=αR equation? (Looks ok, just checking.)

Eitan Levy said:
Then when I tried to say that a=αR (pure rolling) I get that f=0,
Is that necessarily wrong?

BvU said:
One cause is that f appears with a + sign in the first and with a - sign in the second equation. Subtract them and you get f = 0.
The signs look ok to me.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU
haruspex said:
The next step with such questions, after drawing the FBD, is to be very clear about which directions of displacement, acceleration, force, and rotation are positive.
Looks like you have right as positive for linear motion. Which way are taking as positive for rotation? Is that consistent with your a=αR equation? (Looks ok, just checking.)Is that necessarily wrong?The signs look ok to me.
I thought it was consistent. First of all I can't understand how is it possible for pure rolling to occur without friction. Also, if we assume that those equation are correct I get ω=√(k/m) while the answer is ω=√(3k/2m) so obviously something is wrong.
 
I'll try to translate the question again.

A cylinder with a mass of M and radius R is attached to a spring with a constant of K. The attachment always stays the same as described in the picture (the distance between the center of the cylinder and the attachment is always R/2). We move the center of the cylinder to the right and release it. The cylinder rolls without slipping (pure rolling). What is the frequency of the motion? ICM=0.5MR^2, the center of mass is at the center of the cylinder.

The answer is f=1/(2π)*√(3k/2m).

From what I understand by reading the solution, the problem is that for some reason αR=a is incorrect but 1.5αR=a is correct. I have absolutely no idea why.
 
Eitan Levy said:
I can't understand how is it possible for pure rolling to occur without friction
Rolling just means there is no relative motion between the points in contact.
Think of just the wall, spring and cylinder, no floor, no gravity. In fact, replace the spring by some arbitrary constant force pushing or pulling on the cylinder at some point.
If the force is applied at the centre of the cylinder, it won't rotate at all. The further away from the centre, the greater the rotation, but the linear acceleration stays the same.
At some point, the rotation is so great that parts of the cylinder, on the side away from where the force is applied, move the opposite way to the cylinder's centre.
At exactly the right distance (R/2), the point of the cylinder furthest from the applied force has no linear acceleration in the force direction.
 
Last edited:
Eitan Levy said:
The answer is f=1/(2π)*√(3k/2m).

From what I understand by reading the solution, the problem is that for some reason αR=a is incorrect but 1.5αR=a is correct. I have absolutely no idea why.
That's not the answer I get. Please post the whole solution if you can.
 
I have problem understanding how the attachment of the spring to the cylinder remains always at that point and at that angle, while the cylinder moves and rotates.

There must be some sort of patented mechanism which of course is not shown, right?
 
Delta2 said:
I have problem understanding how the attachment of the spring to the cylinder remains always at that point and at that angle, while the cylinder moves and rotates.

There must be some sort of patented mechanism which of course is not shown, right?
Small angle approximation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
6K