How fast is the distance between the cars changing at this moment

  • Thread starter Thread starter paraboloid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cars Moment
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the rate of change of distance between two cars using the formula for dz/dt. The user correctly applies the chain rule and partial derivatives, ultimately determining that dz/dt equals -81.3489. However, a participant clarifies that this indicates the distance is decreasing at a rate of +81.3489, correcting the interpretation of the negative sign. The mathematical approach involves using the equation z = (x^2 + y^2)^(1/2) and applying derivatives appropriately.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, specifically partial derivatives
  • Familiarity with the chain rule in differentiation
  • Knowledge of the distance formula in two dimensions
  • Ability to interpret negative rates of change in context
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the chain rule in multivariable calculus
  • Learn about interpreting rates of change in physics problems
  • Explore advanced topics in calculus, such as gradient vectors
  • Practice problems involving distance and rates of change in two-dimensional space
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, physics enthusiasts, and anyone interested in understanding rates of change in motion dynamics.

paraboloid
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
[Solved]How fast is the distance between the cars changing at this moment

f37rfc.jpg


I'm in need of help with the last part (finding dz/dt).

I'm sorry I don't know how to use latex.
Let D refer to partial derivatives.

This was my attempt best try:

Given dz/dt = Dz/Dt*dx/d+ Dz/Dt*dy/dt and z = (x^2+y^2)^(1/2),

2z*dz/dt = 2x*dx/dt + 2y*dy/dt
2(.36+.49)^(1/2)*dz/dt= 2(.6)(-55)+2(.7)(-60)
dz/dt = (2(.6)(-55)+2(.7)(-60)) / (2(.36+.49)^(1/2))
dz/dt = -81.3489

Any help would be great,
thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't see anything wrong with how you are working it out. The only thing that comes to mind is that you are saying the distance is "decreasing" at the rate of "-81.3489". Isn't that sort of double negative? I would say it's decreasing at the rate of +81.3489.
 
Good call. Thanks Dick!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K