But then again, I could be wrong.

  • Thread starter Thread starter masterchiefo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Differential
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a system of differential equations modeling chemical reactions involving substances A, B, and C. Participants are tasked with analyzing the concentrations of these substances over time, given specific initial conditions and a set of rate constants.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants attempt to calculate the time derivative of the sum of concentrations and deduce relationships between them. Questions arise regarding the integration process and the nature of the differential equations involved. Some participants express confusion over the setup and the implications of the equations.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the relationships between the variables and the differential equations. Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach the problem, while others are still seeking clarity on specific steps and interpretations. Multiple interpretations of the equations and their implications are being discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential inconsistencies in the problem setup, such as the naming of substances and the treatment of rate constants. There is also mention of initial conditions and how they affect the solution process.

masterchiefo
Messages
211
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Chemical reactions being studied in which a body A undergoes transformations
according to the following scheme:
http://prntscr.com/8shuvb

k1, k2, k3 , k4 are the rate constants .
We denote x (t ), y ( t) , z (t) the respective concentrations of the products A, B, C at a given time t
( t expressed in minutes).
The initial conditions x (0) = 1, y (0) = 0 and z ( 0) = 0 .
Is arranged above the vessel where the reaction takes place by a burette which is poured
product A at a constant speed in the tank. Under these experimental conditions,
functions x , y, z defined on the interval [0 ; + infinite [ check the following differential system :

dx/dt (1-2x +y+ z)
dy/dt (x - y)
dz/dt (x - z)

Question 1:
Calculate d/dt( x + y + z) and , using the initial conditions, deduce that :
y(t) + z(t) = 1 + t - x(t)
Question 2:
Demonstrate that x is a solution of the differential equation (E) : dx/dt + 3x = 2 + t, then resolve
Equation ( E) knowing that it validates the initial condition x (0) = 1 .

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

Question 1:
dx/dt+dy/dt+dz/dt= 1-2x+y+z+x-y+x-z
dx/dt+dy/dt+dz/dt= 1

integral dx/dt+ integral dy/dt+ integral dz/dt= integral ( 1 dt)
x(t)+y(t)+z(t)=t*c
y(t)+z(t)=t*c-x(t)

Question 2:
dx/dt+3x=2+t
dx/dt =2+t-3x

dx/dt(x) =1
1= 2+x-3x
1=2+-2x
... does not work. :(
I am not sure what to do here, some tips would help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
masterchiefo said:

Homework Statement


Chemical reactions being studied in which a body A undergoes transformations
according to the following scheme:
http://prntscr.com/8shuvb

k1, k2, k3 , k4 are the rate constants .
We denote x (t ), y ( t) , z (t) the respective concentrations of the products A, B, C at a given time t
( t expressed in minutes).
The initial conditions x (0) = 1, y (0) = 0 and z ( 0) = 0 .
Is arranged above the vessel where the reaction takes place by a burette which is poured
product A at a constant speed in the tank. Under these experimental conditions,
functions x , y, z defined on the interval [0 ; + infinite [ check the following differential system :

dx/dt (1-2x +y+ z)
dy/dt (x - y)
dz/dt (x - z)

Question 1:
Calculate d/dt( x + y + z) and , using the initial conditions, deduce that :
y(t) + z(t) = 1 + t - x(t)
Question 2:
Demonstrate that x is a solution of the differential equation (E) : dx/dt + 3x = 2 + t, then resolve
Equation ( E) knowing that it validates the initial condition x (0) = 1 .

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

Question 1:
dx/dt+dy/dt+dz/dt= 1-2x+y+z+x-y+x-z
dx/dt+dy/dt+dz/dt= 1

integral dx/dt+ integral dy/dt+ integral dz/dt= integral ( 1 dt)
x(t)+y(t)+z(t)=t*c

You need an additive constant when integrating, not a multiplicative one!
 
Rather a weird question so I wonder if you have reproduced it properly.

First substances are called A, B, C then the same substances are called x , y, z.

Then four rate constants k1, 2, 3, 4, are mentioned, afterwards they have all become 1.

The rate of addition is also 1.

OK if the model has been so simplified, you can simplify it a bit further yourself: since y and z are formed and decompose at exactly the same rate and are initially at the same concentration, y = z at all times it is sufficient to formulate e.g.

Constant supply rate 1 ⇒ x ⇔ w

where the forwards and backward rate constants are both 2; at the end of the calculation get y and z back from y = z = w/2.
____________________

(Corrected)
 
Last edited:
ehild said:
You need an additive constant when integrating, not a multiplicative one!
oops, made a mistake, but is that a good answer ?
y(t)+z(t)=t+c-x(t)

and for question 2 how do I do it?
 
masterchiefo said:
oops, made a mistake, but is that a good answer ?
y(t)+z(t)=t+c-x(t)

and for question 2 how do I do it?
It is correct. Find the value of c from the initial conditions.
Substitute y(t)+z(t) back into the first equation, you get the desired differential equation for x(t).
It is a first-order linear equation, solve with one of the standard methods you certainly have learnt.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: masterchiefo
ehild said:
It is correct. Find the value of c from the initial conditions.
Substitute y(t)+z(t) back into the first equation, you get the desired differential equation for x(t).
It is a first-order linear equation, solve with one of the standard methods you certainly have learnt.
this is the first equation ?
dx/dt + 3x = 2 + thow am I supposed to substitute ?
 
masterchiefo said:
this is the first equation ?
dx/dt + 3x = 2 + thow am I supposed to substitute ?
I meant y(t)+z(t) substituted into dx/dt = (1-2x +y+ z).
You should get the equation dx/dt + 3x = 2 + t, but you have to prove it.
The next task is to solve this differential equation and give x(t) using the initial condition x(0)=1.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: masterchiefo
ehild said:
I meant y(t)+z(t) substituted into dx/dt = (1-2x +y+ z).
You should get the equation dx/dt + 3x = 2 + t, but you have to prove it.
The next task is to solve this differential equation and give x(t) using the initial condition x(0)=1.
dx/dt=1-2x+(y+z)
dx/dt=1-2x+(1+t-x(t))
dx/dt=2-2x+t-x(t)
dx/dt=2-3x+t
dx/dt+3x=2+t

by doing this I prove that X is a solution ?
and now I just resolve this as a normal linear differential equation ?
 
You derived the de for x(t). Resolve it as a normal linear first order differential equation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: masterchiefo
  • #10
masterchiefo said:
dx/dt (1-2x +y+ z)
dy/dt (x - y)
dz/dt (x - z)
A differential system is a system of equations, each of which should have = in it somewhere.
Is this the system?
dx/dt = 1 - 2x + y + z
dy/dt = x - y
dz/dt = x - z
masterchiefo said:
Question 1:
Calculate d/dt( x + y + z) and , using the initial conditions, deduce that :
y(t) + z(t) = 1 + t - x(t)
Question 2:
Demonstrate that x is a solution of the differential equation (E) : dx/dt + 3x = 2 + t
This doesn't make any sense to me. You need to have x as some function of t. The differential equation you show above (equation E) is a first-order, nonhomogeneous equation. One technique for solution is to find an integrating factor.
masterchiefo said:
, then resolve
Equation ( E) knowing that it validates the initial condition x (0) = 1 .
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: masterchiefo
  • #11
ehild said:
You derived the de for x(t). Resolve it as a normal linear first order differential equation.
okay, 1 and 2 is done thank you very much. This problem confusing me a lot.

Now for Question 3:
Prove that d/dt(y - z) + y - z = 0 and deduce that y = z
d/dt(y - z) = 0 so,.
y-z=0
y = z

Not sure if I am doing this right.
 
  • #12
masterchiefo said:
okay, 1 and 2 is done thank you very much. This problem confusing me a lot.

Now for Question 3:
Prove that d/dt(y - z) + y - z = 0 and deduce that y = z
d/dt(y - z) = 0 so,.
y-z=0
y = z

Not sure if I am doing this right.
How did you get the equation in red?

Start with the original equations in the problem.
dy/dt (x - y)
dz/dt (x - z)
Subtract them. What do you get?
 
  • #13
ehild said:
How did you get the equation in red?

Start with the original equations in the problem.
dy/dt (x - y)
dz/dt (x - z)
Subtract them. What do you get?
(x-y)-(x-z)= -y+z

d/dt(y - z) + (y - z) = 0
d/dt(-y+z) + (-y+z) =0
 
  • #14
masterchiefo said:
(x-y)-(x-z)= -y+z

d/dt(y - z) + (y - z) = 0
d/dt(-y+z) + (-y+z) =0
Sorry, the original equation missed the equal signs.

So it should have been
dy/dt= (x - y)
dz/dt =(x - z)
When you subtract them, it becomes d/dt(y-z)+(y-z)=0
You can consider y-z as a new function v = y-z, and you have the differential equation dv/dt+v=0. What is the solution for v(t) and what is the initial condition?
 
  • #15
ehild said:
Sorry, the original equation missed the equal signs.

So it should have been
dy/dt= (x - y)
dz/dt =(x - z)
When you subtract them, it becomes d/dt(y-z)+(y-z)=0
You can consider y-z as a new function v = y-z, and you have the differential equation dv/dt+v=0. What is the solution for v(t) and what is the initial condition?
I don't understand how it becomes d/dt(y-z)+(y-z)=0
when I subtract them I get (x - y)-(x - z) = z-y
 
  • #16
masterchiefo said:
I don't understand how it becomes d/dt(y-z)+(y-z)=0
when I subtract them I get (x - y)-(x - z) = z-y
Subtract both sides. On the left sides, you have the derivatives of y and z : dy/dt and dz/dt. What is their difference?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: masterchiefo
  • #17
ehild said:
Subtract both sides. On the left sides, you have the derivatives of y and z : dy/dt and dz/dt. What is their difference?
ah Okay,

so its like this: dy/dt - dz/dt = x-y-(x-z)

dy/dt - dz/dt =-y+z
dy/dt - dz/dt +y-z =0
d/dt(y-z) + ( y-z) =0

dv/dt +v =0

I find v(t)= C * e-t
 
  • #18
masterchiefo said:
ah Okay,

so its like this: dy/dt - dz/dt = x-y-(x-z)

dy/dt - dz/dt =-y+z
dy/dt - dz/dt +y-z =0
d/dt(y-z) + ( y-z) =0

dv/dt +v =0

I find v(t)= C * e-t
Good. What were the initial conditions for y and z?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: masterchiefo
  • #19
ehild said:
Good. What were the initial conditions for y and z?
y (0) = 0 and z ( 0) = 0
 
  • #20
masterchiefo said:
y (0) = 0 and z ( 0) = 0
What initial condition does it mean for v?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: masterchiefo
  • #21
ehild said:
What initial condition does it mean for v?
v(t)=y(t)-z(t)

v(0)=0
 
  • #22
masterchiefo said:
v(t)=y(t)-z(t)

v(0)=0
So what is v(t)?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: masterchiefo
  • #23
ehild said:
So what is v(t)?
v(t)= 0
y(t)-z(t)=0
y(t)=z(t)

You are awesome, thank you so much for the help.
Last thing, I want to push this problem a little bit.
now since we know that y(t) is equal to z(t), if I want to find the equation for them.

y(t)= 1 + t - x(t) - z(t)
z(t)= 1 + t - x(t) - y(t)

is this how I do it?
 
  • #24
masterchiefo said:
v(t)= 0
y(t)-z(t)=0
y(t)=z(t)

You are awesome, thank you so much for the help.
Last thing, I want to push this problem a little bit.
now since we know that y(t) is equal to z(t), if I want to find the equation for them.

y(t)= 1 + t - x(t) - z(t)
z(t)= 1 + t - x(t) - y(t)

is this how I do it?
Not quite.
You know that y(t)=z(t), and y(t)+z(t)=2y(t) =1+t-x(t). You also know x(t). What is y(t) then?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: masterchiefo
  • #25
ehild said:
Not quite.
You know that y(t)=z(t), and y(t)+z(t)=2y(t) =1+t-x(t). You also know x(t). What is y(t) then?
x(t)= 1/9 *(4/e3t+3t+5)
2y(t) = 1+t- x(t)

2y(t) = 1+t-1/9 *(4/e3t+3t+5)

y(t) = (1+t-1/9 *(4/e3t+3t+5))/2
and
z(t) = (1+t-1/9 *(4/e3t+3t+5))/2

both same equation.
 
  • #26
masterchiefo said:
okay, 1 and 2 is done thank you very much. This problem confusing me a lot.

Now for Question 3:
.

There is some confusion here, so if anything is clear we should see it stated. If the differential equation for x is solved please tell us the solution.

Also because the rest is easy - once we know x the rest is just algebra. We have an algebraic relationship between x, y, z and t and also y=z as pointed out previously.
 
  • #27
masterchiefo said:
x(t)= 1/9 *(4/e3t+3t+5)
2y(t) = 1+t- x(t)

2y(t) = 1+t-1/9 *(4/e3t+3t+5)

y(t) = (1+t-1/9 *(4/e3t+3t+5))/2
and
z(t) = (1+t-1/9 *(4/e3t+3t+5))/2

both same equation.
It looks correct, but can be simplified a bit.
 
  • #28
epenguin said:
There is some confusion here, so if anything is clear we should see it stated. If the differential equation for x is solved please tell us the solution.

Also because the rest is easy - once we know x the rest is just algebra. We have an algebraic relationship between x, y, z and t and also y=z as pointed out previously.
x(t)= 1/9 *(4/e3t+3t+5)
 
  • #29
Is that same thing as x(t) = (1/9)* (4e-3t + 3t + 5) and have you checked it works?
 
  • #30
epenguin said:
Is that same thing as x(t) = (1/9)* (4e-3t + 3t + 5) and have you checked it works?
See post #25. It is the same.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: masterchiefo

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K