How fast must a meter stick be moving if its length is....

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tonia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Length Meter
Click For Summary
To determine how fast a meter stick must move for its length to measure 0.500 meters, the equation v/c = sqrt(1 - (1/L)^2) is used, leading to v = sqrt(3)c/2. Initial calculations mistakenly used sqrt(3c/2) instead of correctly applying the formula. The correct approach involves calculating sqrt(3) and then multiplying by c/2, resulting in a speed of approximately 2.5 x 10^8 km/sec. It's emphasized that maintaining significant digits during calculations is crucial to avoid rounding errors. The final answer is confirmed to be correct after proper adjustments.
Tonia
Messages
96
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


How fast must a meter stick be moving of its length is measured to shrink to 0.500 meters?

Homework Equations


v/c = sqrt(1 - (1/L)^2) = sqrt(1 - 1/4) = sqrt(3/4) = sqrt(3)/2 or use v = sqrt(3)c/2

The Attempt at a Solution


(squrt 3c/2) = squrt 450000000 = 21213.203 = 21213.2 km/sec.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have taken sqrt(3c/2) instead of sqrt(3) c/2 ... The square root of a velocity can never be a velocity.
 
So it's (sqrt of 3)/(c/2)??
 
No, your original math when arriving at sqrt(3) c/2 was correct. What you did not do correctly was inserting numbers into this formula. There is a difference between sqrt(3) c/2 and sqrt(3c/2)...
 
So my answer is correct? I still don't understand.
 
No, it is not correct. What part of sqrt(3) c/2 is not equal to sqrt(3c/2) do you find confusing.
 
After I take the square root of 3, I multiply that by the c/2??
 
Yes, this is what your expression tells you to do.
 
1.7320 times c/2 = 1.7320 times 150,000,000 = 2.598E8 = 2.598 X 10^8 km/sec
 
  • #10
Better, but as you are giving the speed of light with one significant digit, you really should not have four significant digits in your answer.
 
  • #11
1.7 times 150,000,000 = 2.55E^8 = 2.5 X 10^8 km/sec.
 
  • #12
You should always keep all digits in intermediate steps, otherwise your results will contain rounding errors which can propagate and amplify. The more correct thing to do would be to simply round the final result down to two significant digits.
 
  • #13
Other than that my answer is correct?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
707
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K