Intro Math How good is "A Course of Higher Mathematics" by Smirnov?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the value of reading "Course of Higher Mathematics" by Smirnov, particularly for self-study in mathematics and physics. Participants express mixed feelings about the book's relevance due to its Soviet origins, with some arguing that it provides a comprehensive range of mathematical concepts and is beneficial for understanding analysis, especially for physicists. Concerns about the book being outdated are raised, but others counter that Soviet-era texts often excel in clarity and problem-solving examples, fostering a deeper intuitive understanding. The discussion also touches on the quality of Soviet textbooks compared to modern ones, with some asserting that many contemporary texts lack rigor. Overall, while there are reservations about the book's age and the general quality of Soviet literature, many believe Smirnov's series can be a valuable resource for dedicated self-learners.
fxdung
Messages
387
Reaction score
23
Is it worthwhile to read the book Course of Higher Mathematics by Smirnov?It is a serie so may be it easy to read because there are not gaps when reading process occur(?) for self-study mathematics for physics?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Physics news on Phys.org
It was useful for my self study of calculus. But I am afraid modern texts has come after it.
 
Is it out of date?But it cover a broad range of mathematics?
 
I think it's among the best textbooks on analysis, at least for physicists.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier, dextercioby, ipsky and 1 other person
But the book written in Soviet period, so I still suspect the qualification of it?(Usually Soviet books are bad books).Is the book a special case?(I know that e.g serie of Landau is good one)
 
Last edited:
Well, I only know good Russian math and physics textbooks. I guess it's a natural filter. Nobody bothered to translate bad books into English or German ;-)).
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier and anuttarasammyak
I have the book Linear Algebra and Group Theory and it is good, a little advanced for me with my limited LA, but it reads well and the exercises look good.
 
fxdung said:
But the book written in Soviet period, so I still suspect the qualification of it?(Usually Soviet books are bad books).Is the book a special case?(I know that e.g serie of Landau is good one)
What is a bad book for you?

Check the preface and introduction to ascertain the prerequisite knowledge assumed by the author. Read through a few randomly selected pages to get a feel for the language and presentation style of the author, and to see whether it helps you relate to the concepts. Also check the author's biography and academic lineage.

In my opinion, Soviet era books on physics and mathematics that were translated to English have significantly helped me develop an intuitive understanding, more so than contemporary textbooks. They have generally included well-chosen solved examples and answers to the problems. They write with prudence and generally do not repeat themselves. This demands considerable effort on my behalf, but the joy is exponential. If this suits you, Smirnov's series should help with your self-study.
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby and vanhees71
fxdung said:
But the book written in Soviet period, so I still suspect the qualification of it?(Usually Soviet books are bad books).Is the book a special case?(I know that e.g serie of Landau is good one)
Actually it is the other way around. Books on maths and physics from that period are usually very good. Now the number of crackpots' books so large that I am always skeptical to read any text written in Russian.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71

Similar threads

Back
Top