How hard is Real Analysis 2 compared to Real Analysis 1?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Real Analysis 2 is a continuation of Real Analysis 1, focusing on functions of multiple variables, partial differentiation, and multiple integration. The course covers advanced topics such as Taylor Series, the Implicit Function Theorem, the Weierstrass Approximation Theorem, and the Arzela-Ascoli Theorem. Students transitioning from Real Analysis 1 to Real Analysis 2 generally find the difficulty manageable, as the foundational concepts are built upon and reinforced. A solid grasp of the material from Real Analysis 1 is essential for success in Real Analysis 2.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the real number system and point set theory
  • Familiarity with limits, continuity, and differentiability
  • Knowledge of Riemann integrability
  • Basic algebraic manipulations and modular arithmetic for Elementary Number Theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem and its applications
  • Study the Implicit Function Theorem and its implications in multivariable calculus
  • Explore Taylor Series and their convergence properties
  • Investigate the Arzela-Ascoli Theorem and its role in functional analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those pursuing advanced studies in analysis, as well as educators and tutors preparing students for higher-level coursework in Real Analysis.

SMA_01
Messages
215
Reaction score
0
Is it a lot harder? I'm taking Real Analysis 1 this semester, and am planning on taking the second part to the course in the Winter.
Also, would it be a bad idea to take Real Analysis 2 and Elementary Number Theory in one semester?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I found it noticeably harder, but it's not a really big leap or anything.
 
Please post the course descriptions of both Real Analysis 1 and 2; those course titles mean completely different things between different schools.
 
PieceOfPi said:
Please post the course descriptions of both Real Analysis 1 and 2; those course titles mean completely different things between different schools.

Analysis 1:

Properties of the real number system; point set theory for the real line including the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem; sequences, functions of one variable: limits and continuity, differentiability, Reimann integrability.

Analysis 2:

Includes the rigorous study of functions of two and more variables, partial differentiation and multiple integration. Special topics include: Taylor Series, Implicit Function Theorem, Weierstrass Approximation Theorem, Arzela-Ascoli Theorem.
 
I can't comment on the analysis part, but elementary number theory is not very hard. All the theorems involve basic algebraic manipulations, and mods (which you should be use to by now).
 
SMA_01 said:
Analysis 1:

Properties of the real number system; point set theory for the real line including the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem; sequences, functions of one variable: limits and continuity, differentiability, Reimann integrability.

Analysis 2:

Includes the rigorous study of functions of two and more variables, partial differentiation and multiple integration. Special topics include: Taylor Series, Implicit Function Theorem, Weierstrass Approximation Theorem, Arzela-Ascoli Theorem.

If you got through Analysis 1 alive, then you won't find Analysis 2 much harder. In fact, I think Analysis 1 is the hardest course since you got to get used to the techniques and proofs of analysis. In analysis 2, you're already used to that. So you won't find it too difficult.
 
SMA_01 said:
Analysis 1:

Properties of the real number system; point set theory for the real line including the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem; sequences, functions of one variable: limits and continuity, differentiability, Reimann integrability.

Analysis 2:

Includes the rigorous study of functions of two and more variables, partial differentiation and multiple integration. Special topics include: Taylor Series, Implicit Function Theorem, Weierstrass Approximation Theorem, Arzela-Ascoli Theorem.

Thanks! Based on the course descriptions, Analysis 2 sounds like a very reasonable sequence that follows Analysis 1. It can hard in a sense that the materials build upon what you learned in analysis 1 (afterall, you need to be solid on the analysis of R^1 in order to learn the analysis of R^n). On the other hand, if you have a solid understanding of analysis 1, analysis 2 shouldn't be too hard, since you will see same kinds of techniques from analysis 1 again.
 
Thank you, that was helpful :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K