How High Was the Girl Above the Water When She Released the Rope?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a girl swinging on a rope and determining her height above water when she releases the rope. It is situated within the context of projectile motion, specifically analyzing vertical displacement with initial velocity and angle considerations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the equation for vertical motion, questioning the calculations and the assumptions made regarding the direction of gravitational acceleration.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided calculations and expressed discrepancies with the expected answer. There is an ongoing examination of the calculations and the correct application of the formula, with no clear consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working with the assumption that initial positions are zero and are considering the effects of gravity in their calculations. There is a noted difference between the calculated results and the answer provided in the textbook.

New-Blu-Blood
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


On a hot summer day, a young girl swings on a rope above the local swimming hole . When she let's go of the rope her initial velocity is 2.10 m/s at an angle of 35.0 degrees above the horizontal. If she is in flight for 0.615 s, how high above the water was she when she let go of the rope?


Homework Equations



The equation I used to try to solve for the problem was y=(v0sin(theta))t-.5gt2

The Attempt at a Solution



I know the angle is 35 degrees, initial velocity is 2.10 m/s and that initial X and Y positions are both zero. I plug my numbers into the equation given above and get 3.15 for y. The answer in the back of the book says 1.07 meters, but I can't figure out how they arrived at this answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Show your calculations. I am getting different answer.
 
Ok, I think I messed the calculation up a little. Here should be the correct calculation.

y= (2.10 x sin 35).615 - .5(-9.80).6152 = 2.59 or 3
 
New-Blu-Blood said:
Ok, I think I messed the calculation up a little. Here should be the correct calculation.

y= (2.10 x sin 35).615 - .5(-9.80).6152 = 2.59 or 3
When you use the formula
y = vo*t - 0.5*g*t^2, you assume that y and vo are in the upward direction and g is in the downward direction. So you should not use -g in the equation.
 

Similar threads

Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K