How in the world did I get the right answer? I am scared

  • Thread starter Thread starter flyingpig
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around the behavior of capacitors in a parallel circuit, specifically analyzing the final voltage across two capacitors, C1 (3300uF) and C2 (2200uF), after charging and connecting them. The initial voltage V1i is 6.00V for C1, while C2 starts uncharged. The calculated final voltages were V1f = 3.5V and V2f = 3.2V, which closely matched the measured values. The conversation also addressed energy loss during the charge redistribution, concluding that energy is lost primarily due to resistive losses in the wiring and components.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of capacitor behavior in parallel circuits
  • Knowledge of charge conservation principles
  • Familiarity with energy calculations in electrical systems
  • Basic grasp of electrical terminology such as voltage, capacitance, and energy loss
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of charge conservation in electrical circuits
  • Learn about energy loss mechanisms in capacitors, including resistive and electromagnetic losses
  • Explore the mathematical derivation of voltage distribution in parallel capacitor circuits
  • Investigate the effects of non-ideal components on circuit performance
USEFUL FOR

Students in electrical engineering, physics enthusiasts, and anyone interested in understanding capacitor behavior and energy dynamics in circuits.

  • #31
flyingpig said:
But it is also equal to the change in thermal energy yush?

It may not all be thermal (but most of it is). Some will be radiated away as electromagnetic waves, at frequencies that will depend upon the natural frequency of oscillation of the system due to inherent L, R, and C that all real stuff has, as the system 'rings down' into its final equilibrium state. There may be some mechanical strain energy in the capacitor dielectrics. Maybe some flexing of the capacitor materials when the forces between plates changes.

A complete accounting would be tedious and not trivial to accomplish. It's a lot easier to simply state that there is a loss of electrical potential energy in the system that, for all intents and purposes, has been lost to the environment.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K