How Is a Complex Function Expanded in an Annular Region?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around expanding the function f(z) = 1/(z-1) + 1/(2-z) in an annular region defined by 1 < |z| < 2. Participants are exploring the appropriate series expansion methods for complex functions, particularly in the context of Laurent series and Taylor series.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the necessity of expanding about z=0 and question whether this is the only or easiest option. There is also exploration of why a Taylor series centered at a point within the annulus might not converge for all points in that region.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing their understanding and raising questions about the nature of the series expansions. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of Laurent series and the conditions under which different series converge, but there is no explicit consensus on the best approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the function is analytic within the specified annulus, leading to questions about the appropriateness of using Taylor series versus Laurent series. There is also mention of potential singularities affecting the choice of expansion method.

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
I have an exercise that says the following:

Expand the following function as a series:

f(z) = [itex]\frac{1}{z-1}[/itex] + [itex]\frac{1}{2-z}[/itex] for 1<lzl<2

The result is attached, but I don't really understand what has been done. Therefore tell me:
How is that series generated? Initially I thought I should do a taylor expansion but then that is always expanded about a specific point, which is not given in the exercise.
 

Attachments

  • result.png
    result.png
    2.5 KB · Views: 494
Physics news on Phys.org
You're expanding about z=0. You can tell from the region for which you're asked to find the series. It's an annulus centered at z=0.

Look up Laurent series.
 
okay, I have done and I think I understand it mostly. But I still don't understand how you see that one MUST expand about z=0 - isn't that just done because it is the easiest?
 
Hmm.. Now I've been looking a lot on this exercise, and you need to help me. I do understand that a function which is not analytic at certain singularities can be expanded as a laurent series about them. However, in this exercise f is only defined in the region 1<lzl<2 and is thus analytic everywhere. Therefore, why would a taylor series about a point z0 which satisfies 1<lz0l<2 not work?
I don't really understand what is done to achieve the attached result. The solution notes says that the first expression (which I guess must be 1/(z-1)) is written as a series for z>1 and the second expression (which I again must guess refers to 1/(2-z)) is expanded for z<2. But what on Earth is this supposed to mean? If the functions are expanded around z=0 the above can't be true, and either way you get terms for (1/z)k as though a laurent series is written.

Can you please show how to do it, and I will learn from that rather than having to guess my way out of this (my book's chapter on Laurent series is VERY poor).
 
aaaa202 said:
okay, I have done and I think I understand it mostly. But I still don't understand how you see that one MUST expand about z=0 - isn't that just done because it is the easiest?

1 < |z-0|< 2

If it were centered anywhere else, the 0 would be replaced by that number. Remember that |z| < 2 => z in D(0;2)

(I'm on my phone so Latex is a little time consuming to do).
 
aaaa202 said:
Hmm.. Now I've been looking a lot on this exercise, and you need to help me. I do understand that a function which is not analytic at certain singularities can be expanded as a laurent series about them. However, in this exercise f is only defined in the region 1<lzl<2 and is thus analytic everywhere. Therefore, why would a taylor series about a point z0 which satisfies 1<lz0l<2 not work?
No. Such a series won't converge for all points in the annulus. Suppose we expanded 1/(1-z) about z=3/2, for example. First, do some algebra to get
$$\frac{1}{1-z} = \frac{1}{1-(z-3/2)-3/2} = -\frac{1}{1/2} \left(\frac{1}{1+2(z-3/2)}\right).$$ Then use the fact that
$$\frac{1}{1+w} = 1-w+w^2-w^3+\cdots$$ with w=2(z-3/2) to obtain the series
$$\frac{1}{1-z} = -2\left[1-2(z-3/2)+4(z-3/2)^2-8(z-3/2)^3+\cdots\right] = -2+4(z-3/2)-8(z-3/2)^2+\cdots.$$ (You could also find the Taylor series by taking derivatives, but this method is much faster.) This series will converge only when |w|<1, which means that |z-3/2| < 1/2. In other words, it'll only converge for points in the complex plane contained in a circle of radius 1/2 centered at z=3/2. Most of points in the annulus 1<|z|<2 don't meet this criterion, e.g. z=-3/2.

I don't really understand what is done to achieve the attached result. The solution notes says that the first expression (which I guess must be 1/(z-1)) is written as a series for z>1 and the second expression (which I again must guess refers to 1/(2-z)) is expanded for z<2. But what on Earth is this supposed to mean? If the functions are expanded around z=0 the above can't be true, and either way you get terms for (1/z)k as though a laurent series is written.
Consider the Taylor series for 1/(1-z).
$$\frac{1}{1-z} = 1+z+z^2+z^3+\cdots.$$ This series is valid if |z|<1; it won't converge if |z|>1. So for |z|>1, you expand in powers of 1/z. That series will converge because |1/z| will be less than 1.
$$\frac{1}{1-z} = \frac{1}{z(1/z-1)} = -\frac{1}{z}\left(\frac{1}{1-1/z}\right) = -\frac{1}{z}\sum_{n=0}^\infty \left(\frac{1}{z}\right)^n.$$ For your original function, the two singularities divide the complex plane into three regions: |z|<1, 1<|z|<2, and |z|>2. For each region, you expand each term in either powers of z or powers of 1/z so that they'll both converge.

Can you please show how to do it, and I will learn from that rather than having to guess my way out of this (my book's chapter on Laurent series is VERY poor).
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K