How is a Conservation of Energy Problem Solved?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a conservation of energy problem involving a box moving along an incline with friction. Participants are examining the potential energy changes and the effects of friction on the energy calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the correct formulation of potential energy in relation to height differences and the influence of friction on energy conservation equations. Questions arise about the setup and interpretation of the problem, particularly regarding the height at which potential energy is calculated.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing guidance on the correct setup of the energy equations. There is acknowledgment of differing results from kinematic and energy approaches, prompting further exploration of the calculations involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework problem, which may limit the information available and the assumptions that can be made about the system. The presence of friction and the specific geometry of the incline are critical points of discussion.

bodensee9
Messages
166
Reaction score
0
problem solved. Thanks!
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
At first glance I see one error in your energy equation.

In the potential term you need the height difference, which is:

(Lsin30) not (h + Lsin30)
 
Last edited:
Hello:

But point A is on the ground, even below the beginning of the friction part. So wouldn't the potential different be (h + Lsin30)?
Thanks.
 
Its hard to tell what you mean since I can't see the image yet, but from your description the frictional part if the path is on the incline, correct?

If so to find the change in PE, you need the change in height caused by sliding from A to B. This is Lsin30. Draw a picture and see for yourself.

Of course, I could be thinking of some different set up to this problem. Its hard to tell without the image.
 
Hello:

Sorry, so the box is on the flat part at the beginning. Point A is there. Then, the incline is initially frictionless up to a vertical height h, and then the friction part begins. The friction part has length L. So if I were to start from the flat part, wouldn't the change in PE = mg(h + Lsin30)? (because the box has to climb up a height h first to reach the friction part). Thanks.
 
bodensee9 said:
Hello:

Sorry, so the box is on the flat part at the beginning. Point A is there. Then, the incline is initially frictionless up to a vertical height h, and then the friction part begins. The friction part has length L. So if I were to start from the flat part, wouldn't the change in PE = mg(h + Lsin30)? (because the box has to climb up a height h first to reach the friction part). Thanks.

OK right. Then you have the correct PE term. The answers should come out to be the same.

So, next step. What are the two different answers your getting? I'll have an easier time finding your mistake if I can see the answers that your getting.
 
Hello:

So, doing the old kinematics way, I got 3.5 m/s. But doing it the energy way, I have:
1/2*m*8^2 = m*9.8*(2 + .75sin30) + 1/2*m*v^2 + m*9.8*cos30*.75. which comes out to be around 2.17?? Thanks.
 
bodensee9 said:
Hello:

So, doing the old kinematics way, I got 3.5 m/s. But doing it the energy way, I have:
1/2*m*8^2 = m*9.8*(2 + .75sin30) + 1/2*m*v^2 + m*9.8*cos30*.75. which comes out to be around 2.17?? Thanks.

Your set-up of the problem is correct and your understanding of the physics is excellent. Good job!

Your problem is in the execution of your approach, in the section I bolded above. The work done by friction is
= F * [tex]\Delta[/tex] r,

= [tex]\mu[/tex]k * n * [tex]\Delta[/tex] r

= (0.4) * m (9.8 m/s2) * cos30 * (0.75 m)

You forgot to use the coeeficient of kinetic friction in your equation, to find the work done by the force of friction.

Try that, and see if you get the exact same answer both ways.
 
Oh thanks! That took care of the problem!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
933
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K