How Is Diesel Engine Efficiency Calculated Using Compression and Cutoff Ratios?

  • Thread starter Thread starter vladimir69
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diesel Engine
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The efficiency of a diesel engine can be calculated using the compression ratio (r), cutoff ratio (r_c), and the specific heat ratio (γ). The derived formula for efficiency (ε) is ε = 1 - r^(1-γ) * ((r_c^γ - 1) / (γ * (r_c - 1))). This formula incorporates the work done (W_net) and heat absorbed (Q_h) during the thermodynamic cycle. Proper identification of Q_h and W_net is crucial for accurate efficiency calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamic cycles in diesel engines
  • Familiarity with the concepts of compression ratio and cutoff ratio
  • Knowledge of the specific heat ratio (γ) and its significance
  • Proficiency in applying the ideal gas law (PV=nRT) and adiabatic processes
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the diesel engine efficiency formula in detail
  • Learn about the implications of varying compression and cutoff ratios on engine performance
  • Explore the role of specific heat capacities (C_v and C_p) in thermodynamic calculations
  • Investigate the impact of different thermodynamic cycles on engine efficiency
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, automotive engineers, students studying thermodynamics, and anyone involved in optimizing diesel engine performance.

vladimir69
Messages
124
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The diagram below shows the thermodynamic cycle of a diesel engine. The compression ratio is the ratio of maximum to minimum volume; r=\frac{V_{1}}{V_{2}}. In addition, the so-called cutoff ratio is defined by r_{c} = \frac{V_{3}}{V_{2}}. Find an expression for the engine's efficiency, in terms of r, r_{c} and the specific heat ratio \gamma.

Homework Equations


PV=nRT
PV^gamma = constant
W_{adiabatic} = \frac{P_{1}V_{1} - P_{2}V_{2}}{\gamma-1}
\epsilon = \frac{W_{net}}{Q_h}
P_{2} = P_{3}

The Attempt at a Solution


W_{net} = W_{12} + W_{23} + W_{34} + W_{41}
And I think I must only use negative values for Q_h because the efficiency is the ratio of work done to heat absorbed. That is a little bit against what I would think because it would make more sense to me if Q_h was just the sum of Q_12, Q_23, Q_34, Q_41.
First of all
W_{net} = \frac{P_{1}V_{1}-P_{1}r^\gamma V_{2}}{\gamma-1}+P_{1}r^\gamma(V_{3}-V_{2}) + \frac{P_{1}r^\gamma V_{3} - P_{1}r_{c}^\gamma V_{1}}{\gamma-1}
The only negative Q_h I think is Q_41 which is
Q_{h} = Q_{41} = n C_{v} (T_{1}-T_{4}) = \frac{P_{1}V_{1}C_{v}}{R}(1-r_{c}^\gamma)
And when I calculate \epsilon, low and behold out pops the wrong answer (and a huge mess of V1's V2's and so on) which I can't seem to get rid of. So it seems I have plucked out the wrong values to calculate Q_h or W_net but I'm not sure which combination to pull out.

The book manages to squeeze out
\epsilon = 1-r^{1-\gamma}(\frac{r_{c}^\gamma-1}{\gamma(r_{c}-1)})
 

Attachments

  • pvdiagram.JPG
    pvdiagram.JPG
    11.2 KB · Views: 490
Physics news on Phys.org
where did this come from? I'm thinking I have the wrong values for Q_h and W_net but I'm not sure which ones to use. Any insight would be appreciated. Thank you.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K