How Is Electric Potential Calculated for a Curved Rod?

  • Thread starter Thread starter exitwound
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential Rod
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The electric potential for a curved rod is calculated using the formula V = kQ/R, where k is the Coulomb's constant, Q is the total charge, and R is the radius of the arc. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly identifying the length of the rod as R·φ, where φ is the angle in radians. The integral of the potential along the arc is derived from the differential potential dV = Kλ·dθ, leading to the final expression for potential. Understanding the relationship between the radius and the angle is crucial for accurate calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric potential and Coulomb's law
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically integration
  • Knowledge of angular measurements in radians
  • Concept of linear charge density (λ)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric potential for different geometries, such as spherical and cylindrical charge distributions
  • Learn about the applications of electric potential in electrostatics
  • Explore the concept of line integrals in the context of electric fields
  • Investigate the relationship between charge density and electric potential in various configurations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone interested in understanding the calculations of electric potential in curved geometries.

exitwound
Messages
291
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



problem.jpg


Homework Equations



V=kq/r

The Attempt at a Solution



V=kQ/r
dV=kdQ/r

dQ=\lambda d\theta <---This is where I'll make a mistake if any.

dV=k(\lambda d\Theta) /r
V=\frac{k\lambda}{r}\int_0^{\phi}d\Theta
\phi=2\pi/3
\lambda=Q/L= Q/(2\pi/3)

V=k\frac{3Q}{2\pi r}\int_0^{\phi}d\Theta


...so far?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yerr, that is a mistake. You forgot that the length of the rod is R\cdot \phi and not just \phi.

dq=\lambda dl=\lambda R \cdot d\theta
\lambda \equiv \frac{Q}{R\cdot\phi}

dV=\frac{K}{R}\cdot dq

dV=\frac{K}{R}\cdot\lambda R \cdot d\theta

dV=K\lambda\cdot d\theta

dV=\frac{KQ}{R\cdot\phi}\cdot d\theta

And now it's just a question of taking the integral along the arc and you're done.

The surprising result I got is that the potential is just V=\frac{KQ}{R}
 
Last edited:
See, that is where I knew I'd make a mistake. I can't understand why it's <br /> R\cdot \phi. No problems I've found online explain it either. Where does the R come from?
 
exitwound said:
See, that is where I knew I'd make a mistake. I can't understand why it's <br /> R\cdot \phi. No problems I've found online explain it either. Where does the R come from?

Just by definition. The length of a circular arc of radius R resting on x radians is R\cdotx

Just like how a circle of radius R has a circumference of 2\pi R, that's the same as saying you've got a circular arc of radius R resting on 2\pi radians.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
52
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K