ILoveParticlePhysics
- 9
- 4
How do we know that e^πi= -1 if all numbers here are basically undefined/irrational?
The discussion centers around the proof of Euler's identity, specifically the equation \( e^{\pi i} = -1 \), using differential equations and power series. Participants explore the definitions and properties of the exponential function, particularly in relation to complex numbers and trigonometric functions.
Participants express differing views on the nature of the numbers involved in Euler's identity, with some questioning their definitions while others focus on the mathematical proof. The discussion includes both supportive and critical perspectives, indicating that no consensus has been reached regarding the foundational aspects of the identity.
Some limitations include the potential ambiguity in the definitions of the numbers involved and the reliance on the uniqueness of solutions to differential equations, which may not be universally accepted without further clarification.
Generalisations of the exponential function can usually be defined via the power series method above. That's how we can also define the exponential of a matrix.ILoveParticlePhysics said:How do we know that e^πi= -1 if all numbers here are basically undefined/irrational?