How is Euler's Identity proven using differential equations?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ILoveParticlePhysics
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the proof of Euler's identity, specifically the equation \( e^{\pi i} = -1 \), using differential equations and power series. Participants explore the definitions and properties of the exponential function, particularly in relation to complex numbers and trigonometric functions.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the validity of \( e^{\pi i} = -1 \) by suggesting that the numbers involved are undefined or irrational.
  • Another participant suggests starting from the power series representation of the exponential function, \( e^{iz} = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{i^k z^k}{k!} \), and proposes splitting the sum into odd and even terms to relate it to sine and cosine functions.
  • A third participant reiterates the question about the irrationality of the numbers involved in the identity, emphasizing the generalization of the exponential function through power series.
  • One participant provides a proof using differential equations, stating that both \( f(x) = e^{ix} \) and \( g(x) = \cos{x} + i\sin{x} \) satisfy the same differential equation and initial condition, leading to the conclusion that they are the same function.
  • This participant concludes by suggesting to evaluate \( f(\pi) = g(\pi) \) to derive Euler's identity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the numbers involved in Euler's identity, with some questioning their definitions while others focus on the mathematical proof. The discussion includes both supportive and critical perspectives, indicating that no consensus has been reached regarding the foundational aspects of the identity.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the potential ambiguity in the definitions of the numbers involved and the reliance on the uniqueness of solutions to differential equations, which may not be universally accepted without further clarification.

ILoveParticlePhysics
Messages
9
Reaction score
4
How do we know that e^πi= -1 if all numbers here are basically undefined/irrational?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey, I'm not irrational! :smile: Anyway, start from$$e^{iz} = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{i^k z^k}{k!} $$and split this sum into odd and even terms. See if you can get it in terms of sines and coses.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970 and PeroK
ILoveParticlePhysics said:
How do we know that e^πi= -1 if all numbers here are basically undefined/irrational?
Generalisations of the exponential function can usually be defined via the power series method above. That's how we can also define the exponential of a matrix.
 
In case you are more familiar with differential equations, there's a proof of the fact that ##e^{ix}=\cos{x}+i\sin{x}## that it's really nice. If we define
$$f(x)=e^{ix}, \qquad g(x)=\cos{x}+i\sin{x}$$
It is really easy to see that both satisfy the differential equation
$$f'(x) = i f(x), \qquad g'(x) = i g(x)$$
Furthermore, both satisfy the initial condition
$$f(0)=g(0)=1$$
Because ##f(0)=e^{0}=1##.
Then, since these two functions satisfy the same differential equation with the same initial condition, by the uniqueness of the solutions (Picard's theorem) they must be the same function. QED

Then just evaluate ##f(\pi)=g(\pi)## to obtain Euler's identity.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: DrClaude, mfb and PeroK

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K