How is hydrogen more stable in diatomic form?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Molecular hydrogen (H2) is significantly more stable than atomic hydrogen (H) due to the energy dynamics of covalent bonding. It requires 4.6 eV to dissociate an H2 molecule compared to 13.6 eV for breaking apart a single H atom. The stability arises from the quantum mechanical effects of symmetry and the distribution of paired electrons in the 1s orbital, which enhances electrostatic attraction between the atoms. This phenomenon is rooted in the principles of the octet rule and the geometry of electron distribution in molecular structures.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with covalent bonding concepts
  • Knowledge of the octet rule in chemistry
  • Basic grasp of molecular orbital theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of molecular orbital theory
  • Study the octet rule and its implications for hydrogen and helium
  • Learn about quantum mechanics effects in chemical bonding
  • Explore the concept of electron distribution in molecular structures
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, physicists, and anyone interested in the stability of molecular structures and the principles of quantum mechanics in bonding.

vanmaiden
Messages
101
Reaction score
1
Hello Physicsforums,

I'm curious to know what stability hydrogen receives through adding one more electron to its 1s sublevel level. The whole sublevel is at the same energy state, so why must it fill that one more space to attain stability? What does a full 1s orbital do to make it stable? I can see why it's inert, but we stay it's more stable.

Thanks,

Vanmaiden
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Is molecular hydrogen said to be more stable than atomic hydrogen? Who by? And in what context?

You need 13.6eV to break apart a H atom, but only 4.6eV to break apart an H2 molecule.

The stability of a covalent bond is a QM effect from symmetry.
Paired electrons in sub-shells sort-of "balance out the load" on an atom.
But you should be aware that molecular energy levels are not the same as the atomic ones.

See also:
http://www.eng.fsu.edu/~dommelen/quantum/style_a/hmol.html
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/molecule/hmol.html
 
The reasoning here is the same as for all elements: the octet rule.
The only difference is that hydrogen and helium are so simple that their "octet" is only two atoms.

This stuff is really all about geometry. Everything in the universe is in a 3d matrix (well, 4d really, but we're being simplistic here). If there are electrons on opposite sides of a proton then everything is much more stable. Imagine... imagine a tight rope walker. When he's walking along the rope holding nothing, he's able to balance and move forward slowly. Give him a pole and he has some weight balancing him out horizontally, and he can move along a bit more steadily. Make him carry a weight in one hand though, and
he's less stable.
(Keep in mind that this is a completely different set of rules [kinetics], but I hope that it helps to illustrate the point a little.)
 
Though electrons in the ground state of hydrogen are symmetrically distributed ... but it's balanced here to pair spin-up and spin-down.
 
vanmaiden said:
Hello Physicsforums,

I'm curious to know what stability hydrogen receives through adding one more electron to its 1s sublevel level. The whole sublevel is at the same energy state, so why must it fill that one more space to attain stability? What does a full 1s orbital do to make it stable? I can see why it's inert, but we stay it's more stable.

Thanks,

Vanmaiden

Yes, a H2 molecule is 4.6 eV more stable than 2 hydrogen atoms. However, the electrons are only seldomly both in the 1s orbital of the same atom. So it is quite misleading to speak of "filling up" the sublevel. Rather in H2 there is the possibility of concerted hopping of the electrons between the two atoms. The atomic wavefunctions are thus allowed to spread out in direction of the bond and at the same time reducing their extension in the direction perpendicular to the bond. This leads to an increased electrostatic attraction responsible for bonding.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K